Wednesday, December 24, 2025
Home Blog Page 57

UN peacekeepers say Israel fired on them in Lebanon

UNIFEL

Israeli forces on Sunday “fired on UNIFIL peacekeepers from a Merkava tank from near a position Israel has established in Lebanese territory”, the peacekeepers said in a statement, adding heavy-machinegun rounds hit about 5 metres (5.5 yards) from their personnel.

UNIFIL noted that the peacekeepers were able to leave safely 30 minutes later after the tank withdrew inside the Israeli position.

The Lebanese army also issued a statement: “The army command affirms that it is working in coordination with friendly countries to put an end to the ongoing violations and breaches by the Israeli enemy, which require immediate action as they represent a dangerous escalation.”

In September, UNIFIL said Israeli drones had dropped four grenades close to its peacekeepers in southern Lebanon with one landing within 20 metres (22 yards) of UN personnel and vehicles.

UNIFIL added the shooting “represents a serious violation of UN Security Council Resolution 1701”, which ended a 2006 conflict between Israel and Hezbollah and also formed the basis of the November 2024 truce.

“Yet again, we call on the [Israeli military] to cease any aggressive behavior and attacks on or near peacekeepers,” UNIFIL announced on Sunday.

UNIFIL has been working with the Lebanese army to maintain the truce between Israel and Hezbollah, which brought an end to intensive hostilities that erupted into full-blown war after the start of the Gaza war in October 2023.

Israel killed more than 4,000 people, mostly civilians, in its recent war on Lebanon and displaced more than a million people. It razed dozens of villages and occupied – and still refuses to withdraw from – at least five points on Lebanese territory as stipulated under the deal.

 

 

US not prepared for results-oriented talks: Iran’s deputy foreign minister

Speaking to reporters on the sidelines of the international conference International Law Under Assault, Aggression and Defense, Khatibzadeh said, “The United States until today in none of its statements over the past few months has had the readiness for a real, results-oriented negotiation.”

He added that the Iranian public should know that the administration over the past months made every effort to prevent this war and its escalation, but what occurred was driven by “a delusion and perceptual distortions.”

According to Khatibzadeh, Washington “wants to achieve its objectives by using diplomacy and a show and theater of negotiation.”

Khatibzadeh made clear that any future engagement with the United States would take place under conditions defined by Iran’s leadership and with an understanding of the imbalance created by American military pressure.

“Iran has always been ready and has declared its readiness to move under the framework of the remarks of the Leader under those conditions,” he said.

He stressed that negotiations cannot be considered neutral when the other side has employed all its military weapons against other countries, armed all its resources, and taken on a posture of threat against other countries.

Because of this, he stated, Iran must remain focused on the “intentions and actions of the other side.”

Khatibzadeh added that if talks with Washington ever occur under the stated conditions, “it will certainly be an armed negotiation.”

He described such a negotiation as one in which Tehran not only has no trust in the United States, but is fully prepared “to take effective measures against the deceptions of the other side.”

 

Ukraine renews calls for more air defence after deadly attack on Kyiv

Volodymyr Zelensky

His latest comments came after Russian missiles struck apartment blocks across the Ukrainian capital Friday.

Russia’s invasion has dragged on for nearly four years, with diplomatic efforts to end the war failing, and fears are growing for the country’s energy security ahead of a fourth winter of war.

Ukraine announced that Russian attacks had killed four people in its southern region Saturday.

“Ukraine needs support that saves lives: more air-defence systems, more protective capabilities and greater resolve from our partners,” Zelensky said on social media.

Earlier, officials had stated that the death toll from Friday’s attack on Kyiv had risen to seven after an elderly woman died in hospital.

Zelensky said one of the victims was Nataliia Khodemnchuk, the wife of an operator at the Chernobyl nuclear power plant who died during the 1986 nuclear disaster.

“Nearly four decades later, Nataliia was killed in a new tragedy caused once again by the Kremlin,” he added.

Other victims of the attack included a couple in their 70s and a 62-year-old.

Ukraine also reported Saturday it had attacked a Russian oil refinery near Moscow.

The Ukrainian army wrote on social media it had hit a refinery in the Ryazan region near Moscow. The strike, it added, was “part of efforts to reduce the enemy’s ability to launch missile and bomb strikes”.

Ukraine has regularly staged missile and drone attacks inside Russia throughout the Kremlin’s invasion since 2022.

Iran warns of “fundamental review” of ties with IAEA if new resolution passes

Kazem Gharib Abadi

Speaking on the sidelines of the International Conference on International Law Under Aggression, Invasion and Defense in Tehran, Kazem Gharibabadi said Germany, the UK and France had “removed themselves from diplomacy with Iran” through recent “counterproductive” actions.

He said the European push for pressure measures stemmed from a failure to achieve their goals through the so-called “snapback” sanctions mechanism, which “did not have the impact they expected and whose fallout was contained.”

Gharibabadi stated that Iran had shown goodwill by reaching an understanding with the IAEA in Cairo, but noted that European states were now seeking pressure rather than engagement.

He said the situation would “certainly be different” for Iran if a resolution is issued, adding that the Cairo agreement has effectively been set aside.

According to the deputy foreign minister, Iran no longer sees meaningful interaction from its counterparts, and is therefore preparing its own reassessment of relations with the agency.

Iran starts cloud seeding operations amid severe drought

“Today, a cloud seeding flight was conducted in the Urmia Lake basin for the first time in the current water year,” which begins in September, according to IRNA news agency.

Urmia, in the northwest, is Iran’s largest lake, but has largely dried out and turned into a vast salt bed due to drought.

IRNA added that further operations would be carried out in the provinces of East and West Azerbaijan.

Cloud seeding involves spraying particles such as silver iodide and salt into clouds from aircraft to trigger rain.

Last year, Iran announced it had developed its own technology for the practice.

On Saturday, IRNA reported that rain had fallen in Ilam, Kermanshah, Kurdistan and Lorestan in the west, as well as in the northwestern West Azerbaijan province.

It quoted the country’s meteorological organisation as saying rainfall had decreased by about 89 percent this year compared with the long-term average.

“We are currently experiencing the driest autumn the country has experienced in 50 years,” it noted.

State media has shown footage of snow falling on the Tochal mountain and ski resort, located in the Tehran area on the Alborz range, for the first time this year.

Iran, a largely arid country, has for years suffered chronic dry spells and heat waves expected to worsen with climate change.

Rainfall in the capital Tehran has been at its lowest level in a century, according to local officials, and half of Iran’s provinces have not seen a drop of rain in months.

Water levels at reservoirs supplying many provinces have fallen to record lows.

Earlier this month, President Masoud Pezeshkian warned that without rain before winter, Tehran could face evacuation, though he did not elaborate.

Other countries in the region have also used cloud seeding to artificially produce rain.

 

 

Iranian VP to attend SCO Council of Heads of Government Meeting in Russia

Aref will travel to Moscow on Monday to attend the meeting scheduled for the following day.

Prior to the Council meeting, representatives from SCO member states held a three-day expert meeting, which will conclude Sunday.

The expert meeting focused on coordinating the draft Action Plan for 2026-2030 for the implementation of the Program of Multilateral Trade and Economic Cooperation among SCO member states, according to a release by the organization.

During the event, the authorized representatives agreed on the text of the Plan, which has been included in the list of documents proposed for signing at the upcoming Council of Heads of Government meeting, the statement added.

Mehrdad Kiaie, director general for SCO and BRICS affairs at the Iranian Foreign Ministry, attended the expert meeting. He also held talks with Iran’s Ambassador to Moscow, Kazem Jalali, discussing the latest measures related to cooperation between Tehran and the Shanghai Cooperation Organization.

Iran became an official member of the SCO in September 2021. The ten-member SCO is a Eurasian political, economic, and international security organization focused on cooperation in politics, economics, security, and counter-terrorism.

 

More forceful response awaits repeated onslaught: Iran govt. spokesperson

Fatemeh Mohajerani made the remarks to Lebanon’s al-Mayadeen television network on Saturday, emphasizing the Islamic Republic’s unwavering commitment to defending its sovereignty and people.

Referring to the unprovoked Israeli-American war on the country in June, she stressed that Iran would not take external sensitivities into account when safeguarding its territory as a matter of principle reflecting its firm determination and readiness for self-defense.

Mohajerani also underscored that Iran’s missile capabilities had been strengthened precisely in response to past attacks, with Tehran now addressing weaknesses exposed during those assaults.

“Iran’s orientation is grounded not in slogans, but in action,” she said, highlighting the nation’s strategic preparedness in the face of potential threats.

On diplomacy, Mohajerani described ongoing Western talks as “meaningless” if dominated by coercion, despite Iran receiving indirect messages about possible negotiations.

She insisted that genuine engagement required agreements based on shared interests that protect the national priorities of both sides, noting that her country has consistently demonstrated seriousness in seeking negotiations, peace, and global engagement.

Regarding nuclear issues, she stressed that discussions were strictly limited to Iran’s nuclear file to the exclusion of all other issues.

Mohajerani reiterated the peaceful nature of the Iranian nuclear energy program, which continued to serve civilian purposes such as medicine, agriculture, and scientific research.

She noted that enriched uranium had been affected during the imposed war, temporarily preventing practical activity, but affirmed that Iran remained within the framework of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

She criticized European states recourse earlier this year to the so-called “snapback mechanism” as illegal, asserting that that Iran-Europe relations proceeded strictly on a basis of mutual benefit and respect.

Highlighting the Islamic Republic’s broader economic and strategic positioning, Mohajerani detailed the country’s resilience against Western sanctions, noting self-sustaining economic policies, structural reforms, and strengthened domestic capabilities.

She emphasized Tehran’s focus on deepening strategic partnerships with Russia and China, fostering such issues as comprehensive trade, joint projects, and scholarships, while also stressing expansion of ties with Persian Gulf neighbors.

 

Iran’s FM says requests for new talks have begun after military aggression

Speaking at an international conference titled “International Law Under Aggression, Invasion and Defense” in Tehran, Araghchi argued that the joint US-Israeli strikes in June failed to achieve their objectives and ultimately reinforced the necessity of diplomatic engagement.

Araghchi said the first missiles launched by the US and Israel “hit the Iran-US negotiating table,” but the conflict demonstrated that the Iranian nuclear issue has no military solution.

He added that while some facilities were damaged, Iran’s technological capabilities and national resolve remained intact.

The minister stressed that negotiations can only proceed on the basis of mutual respect and realistic expectations, warning that no party can secure through talks what it failed to achieve through force.

He reiterated that Tehran has never abandoned diplomacy, blaming Washington for undermining the 2015 JCPOA nuclear agreement.

Araghchi said “Iran emerged from the 12-day conflict militarily stronger and more unified,” and that any future engagement with Tehran must be conducted through “the language of respect and dignity.”

7,000 tons of unexploded Israeli ordnance in Gaza pose great danger to civilians: The Economist

According to The Economist, a considerable danger lies beneath the rubble, where Israeli occupation forces deployed numerous bombs equipped with delayed-action fuses.

These explosives can detonate unpredictably — days, weeks, or even months later — within collapsed structures or underground spaces, creating serious challenges for clearance operations and endangering returning families.

UN data referenced in the report reveals that at least 53 people have died and hundreds more have been injured due to unexploded bombs, although humanitarian organizations estimate that the actual numbers are likely much higher.

Among the most heartbreaking incidents was the case of six-year-old twins, Yahya and Nabila al-Sharbasi, who suffered appalling injuries after mistaking a bomb, abandoned amid the ruins of their neighborhood, for a toy.

Aid organizations emphasize the significant danger faced by children in Gaza’s densely populated residential zones.

UN estimates indicate that more than 7,000 tons of unexploded ordnance are spread throughout approximately 40 percent of Gaza’s neighborhoods, with Beit Hanoun, Beit Lahia, and Jabalia being among the most heavily affected areas.

Humanity & Inclusion, a prominent relief organization, estimates that completely removing these explosives might require 20 to 30 years, or even longer if extensive international engineering assistance is not provided.

“Complete debris removal will never happen,” Nick Orr, an explosive-removal expert with the group, stated.

“Much of it is buried deep. We will be finding these for generations.”

The magazine highlights that despite years having passed since the end of the war against the Takfiri Daesh terrorist group, UN mine-removal teams in Mosul continue to face significant challenges.

However, it cautions that Gaza experienced much more intense bombardment, which has made clearance operations considerably more complex and hazardous.

Efforts to safely disarm unexploded bombs are heavily constrained by Israel, which imposes strict barriers on the import of specialized equipment and expert teams. In addition, it obstructs the professional training of Palestinian personnel required for these operations.

Israel categorizes many vital tools as dual-use items, restricting their entry into the territory. Consequently, bomb-clearance teams have had to rely on improvisation, often repurposing old food bags by filling them with sand to construct temporary blast barriers.

The report concludes that Gaza faces one of the most significant explosive contamination challenges in the world.

In contrast to Mosul and other war-affected cities, evacuation of residents during the clearance process is not possible in Gaza.

FM: Iran response to 12-day war lawful act of self-defense under UN charter

Speaking on Sunday at the international conference “International Law Under Attack: Aggression and Defense” in Tehran, Seyed Abbas Araqchi said that everyone witnessed how, within nine days, talk of “unconditional surrender” shifted to calls for an “unconditional ceasefire,” and initial miscalculations about the Iranian nation and state evaporated.

Araqchi stated that the conduct of the Islamic Republic of Iran, as one of the founding members of the United Nations, has always been fully consistent with international law.
He added that Iran’s response to the aggression by Israel and the United States was carried out strictly under Article 51 of the UN Charter—its “inherent right of self-defense.”

He stressed that Iran’s defensive operations were designed in accordance with the principles of necessity, proportionality, and distinction between military and civilian targets.

According to Araqchi, Iran adhered to international humanitarian law even at the height of threats and aggression. Unlike the Israeli regime—which massacres hundreds of civilians at the slightest pretext—none of Iran’s actions targeted residential areas or civilians.

He also noted that Iran’s nuclear program is fundamentally grounded in the rights recognized for Iran under Article 4 of the NPT. The development of nuclear technology for peaceful purposes, including enrichment, is an inalienable right of the Iranian nation—a right Iran has never renounced and never will.

Araghchi stressed that Iran for years remained under the most comprehensive verification regime of the International Atomic Energy Agency and fully respected all its technical obligations. Following the 2015 nuclear agreement, the Islamic Republic fully complied with its commitments under the JCPOA and UN Security Council Resolution 2231, as confirmed by 15 consecutive IAEA reports.

The Foreign Minister stated that it was the United States—not Iran—that unilaterally withdrew from the agreement without any justification. Had the US honored its JCPOA commitments, he said, the situation today would be entirely different.

According to Araqchi, the Islamic Republic of Iran has demonstrated that in all crises and conflicts, it acts within the framework of law, while the aggressors have trampled the UN Charter, the non-proliferation regime, principles of fairness, and even peremptory norms of international law in full view of the international community.