Sunday, December 21, 2025
Home Blog Page 8

Ukrainians’ trust in NATO collapses: Survey

The poll was conducted by the Kiev International Institute of Sociology (KIIS) between November 26 and December 13. The pollster sampled opinions of nearly 550 Ukrainian citizens, representing various social and age groups, publishing the results on Monday.

The survey indicated a sharp decline of Ukrainians’ trust in NATO – only 34% of respondents said they were confident about the bloc, compared to 43% last December.

The public trust in the bloc’s leader, the US, experienced an even steeper drop, standing at only 21% against 41% last year.

The decline in Ukrainians’ trust comes against the backdrop of the mediation efforts of the US administration to end the hostilities between Kiev and Moscow. The US has ruled out admitting Ukraine into NATO or sending American troops to the country.

NATO aspirations have long been a key talking point of pro-Western Ukrainian politicians, with Kiev formally applying to join the bloc in 2022. Russia, however, regards eastward expansion of the US-led bloc as one of the key causes of the Ukraine conflict and has repeatedly demanded Kiev formally become a neutral state instead.

Ukrainians’ trust in the EU remained unchanged, hovering at around the 49% mark, with only 23% of respondents signaling their wariness of Brussels. The bloc, save for a handful of its members, has displayed a strong pro-war stance, repeatedly proclaiming its readiness to continue propping up Kiev.

The poll suggested the Ukrainians remain overwhelmingly ready to “withstand” the conflict with Russia for as long as necessary, with some 62% responding affirmatively to this question. The survey also indicated the Ukrainians’ confidence in President Volodymyr Zelensky remaining relatively high, standing at around 61%.

While Zelensky’s presidential term expired early last year, and he refused to hold elections under the pretext of martial law, Ukrainians appear to be unwilling to cast their ballots altogether, the poll indicated. Only 9% of respondents said the presidential elections must be held as soon as possible, while others argued that they should only happen when the conflict with Russia is over.

 

US, Ukraine agree on ’90 percent’ of peace terms, punt on territory: Senior American officials

The comments came after 2 1/2 days of intensive discussions between President Donald Trump’s special envoy for peace missions, Steve Witkoff; the president’s son-in-law Jared Kushner; Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and top European officials in Berlin.

Zelensky, in a post on the social platform X, described the negotiations as a “first draft” but emphasized “the military part looks quite solid.” The Ukrainian president said the two sides “worked very well together” but cautioned against “destructive” elements to be removed.

“This matters, because dignity matters,” he added.

A meeting in Miami is scheduled for the weekend to include “working groups, military people, looking at maps,” a senior official told reporters in a phone briefing. It’s unclear when another meeting with Russia might take place.

“We believe that we probably solve for, I don’t know, it could be 90 percent, literally 90 percent of the issues between Ukraine and Russia,” the senior official said on the call.

“But there’s some more things that have to be worked out.”

Witkoff and Kushner last met with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Moscow on Dec. 2 for about five hours. Putin complained in an interview with India Today that the meeting was too long and that he grew “weary.” He ultimately rejected parts of the 20-point proposal.

The two U.S. officials said that 20-point plan served as the basis for discussions in Berlin. It had not been released or leaked, unlike a 28-point plan that largely favored Russia’s demands.

The officials added consensus was reached on security guarantees “like” NATO’s Article 5 mutual defense pact, but they would not detail what type of U.S. commitments that would entail. The Senate is required to ratify any treaties between the U.S. and another country.

“It would have to go before the Senate, and President Trump is willing to do that,” the second senior U.S. official continued.

The official added Ukrainians and Europeans were surprised the administration believes it can get Russia to sign off on Article 5-like security guarantees for Ukraine, given Moscow’s opposition to Ukraine joining NATO.

The official described the security guarantees as the “platinum standard” but would not provide details, other than saying no U.S. troops would be deployed in Ukraine. They also said the Ukrainians and Europeans were surprised by Trump’s commitments given the administration’s turn away from Europe.

European leaders issued a joint statement Monday offering details that include Ukraine having a peacetime army at 800,000 people and a European “multinational force” — supported by the U.S. — that will operate in Ukraine to help regenerate the country’s armed forces and provide air and sea defense.

The U.S. will also lead a ceasefire monitoring and verification mechanism to provide early warning and a deconfliction mechanism.

In case of an armed attack, guarantees will include a legally binding commitment to take measures that “may include armed force, intelligence and logistical assistance, economic and diplomatic actions.”

The issues of territorial control are likely to be left for bilateral negotiations between Ukraine and Russia, the officials said, even as the White House is proposing “thought-provoking” ideas on how to halt fighting in contested areas.

Russia has called for Ukraine to retreat from areas of control in the Donbas region in eastern Ukraine that Russian forces have failed to achieve militarily, while also asking for international recognition of territory it has seized since 2014.

And while Zelensky on Sunday rejected a U.S.-idea for an “economic free zone” in territory Russia has failed to acquire by military force, the U.S. official said a lot of time was spent “trying to define” what such a zone would be and how it would operate.

“And then ultimately, if we can get that defined, then it will really be up to the parties to work out the final issues of sovereignty and to see if there’s a deal that can be done between them,” the official said.

On the Zaporizhzhia power plant, which is controlled by Russia and located along the front lines in eastern Ukraine, the officials said there’s progress toward an agreement on 50/50 sharing of the power from the plant, but no resolution yet on who will operate the plant.

“There’s still a little bit of a gap between the Russians and the Ukrainians on how that should go, but at the end of the day, they both want it to be repaired and functioning in a good way, and providing energy,” the official said. “And it seems like we’re close to them agreeing to essentially a 50/50 split of the power, which would be, I think, a good outcome there.”

The White House is working on ways to bring Russia back into the global economy so it has “incentives not to go back to war in the future,” the official said, adding, “Hopefully they get focused on a different project in the future, which is really, economy and being part of the global world, which is possible.”

The Wall Street Journal reported that the administration is developing plans to use roughly $200 billion of frozen Russian assets for projects in Ukraine, using the Zaporizhzhia power plant to help power a massive new data center, but also restarting Russian energy flows to Western Europe and the rest of the world and opportunities for U.S. companies to invest with Russia in strategic sectors such as rare earth extraction and drilling in the Arctic.

The U.S. officials said on the call that a key part of discussions with Ukrainians and Europeans was protecting Ukraine’s economy so it can fund its military to the size that would deter future Russian aggression.

Russia has launched a lawsuit against Euroclear, the Belgium-based financial institution holding the majority of the country’s frozen assets, as the European Union moved last week to indefinitely freeze the funds as it debates how to seize them to benefit Ukraine.

The U.S. officials added that the negotiators addressed “extensively” Russia’s frozen funds “how to try and find a way to use them for reconstruction in a way that hopefully can work through an agreement,” but did not provide further details.

 

Ukraine ‘already lost territory’: US

Russia Ukraine War

Last month, the Trump administration put forth a framework for a peace plan aimed at ending the Ukraine conflict. The proposals, which have since been revised multiple times, envisage Kiev renouncing its NATO aspirations, as well as its claims to Crimea and the Donbass regions of Lugansk and Donetsk, all of which joined Russia after referendums, among other points. In return, it would receive unspecified security guarantees.

Asked on Monday what “incentive” Ukraine has to give up territory, Trump suggested it may already be a settled issue.

“Well, they’ve already lost the territory, you know, to be honest. I mean, the territory is lost,” Trump told reporters at the White House.

“But in terms of security guarantee… We’re working on the security guarantees so the war doesn’t start up again.”

Trump said he recently held direct talks with Putin and believes Russia is serious about ending the conflict.

“At this moment, Russia wants to get it [ended]. And the problem is they’ll want to get it ended, and then all of a sudden they won’t. And Ukraine will want to get it ended, and all of a sudden they won’t. So we have to get them on the same page,” he added.

Following talks in Berlin on Monday between Trump’s envoys Steve Witkoff and Jared Kushner and a Ukrainian delegation, Trump said he had “a very good conversation” with European and NATO leaders, as well as Ukraine’s President Volodymyr Zelensky.

“We had very long and very good talks. I think things are going along pretty well,” Trump stated.

Zelensky, however, stated after the meeting that although some progress had been made, “the issue of concessions is definitely not relevant.” He recently floated the idea of a referendum on territorial concessions but insisted that Western security guarantees must be secured beforehand, along with the holding of a long-delayed presidential election.

Moscow has called it a ploy to prolong the conflict and regroup the Ukrainian military. Russia has consistently maintained that Crimea and Donbass, which voted to join the Russian Federation in 2022, are its sovereign territory, and Ukrainian troops will be pushed out of the region one way or the other.

 

Ukraine ready to hold elections, renounce NATO aspirations: Bild

According to the newspaper’s sources, “Ukraine would be prepared to accept both points [of the US plan on holding elections and renouncing a NATO membership bid] under certain conditions.”

Moreover, Kiev is allegedly also ready to “freeze” the current line of engagement but refuses to withdraw its troops from the entire Donbass territory.

On December 9, US President Donald Trump said it was time for elections to be held in Ukraine, arguing that Kiev was using the conflict as a pretext to delay the process.

On the same day, President Volodymyr Zelensky said he was ready to hold presidential elections but stressed that this would require legislative amendments and additional security measures to ensure that members of the military could vote. He called on lawmakers to prepare the necessary legal changes and urged the US and Europe to guarantee the security of the voting process.

On Sunday, US and Ukrainian delegations met at the Federal Chancellor’s Office in Berlin to discuss a possible settlement of the conflict. The US delegation included Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and President Trump’s son-in-law, businessman Jared Kushner. Ukraine was represented by Zelensky, National Security and Defense Council Secretary Rustem Umerov, and Chief of the General Staff of the Ukrainian army Andrey Gnatov. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz left the negotiating room after delivering a brief welcoming address.

The talks are expected to continue on Monday. According to Bild, Catholic Christmas has been set as the new deadline for a potential agreement.

 

Afghanistan’s neighbors refute foreign intervention, sanctions

In a statement released by Iran’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs at the conclusion of the meeting of special representatives of Afghanistan’s neighbors in Tehran, Iran said that the representatives emphasized regional integration and the centrality of the region in resolving existing issues and challenges, including some issues related to Afghanistan.

The Tehran meeting brought together officials from Iran, Pakistan, Russia, Uzbekistan, China, Tajikistan, and Turkmenistan on Sunday to exchange views on the latest developments in Afghanistan and the broader South Asian and Central Asian regions.

According to the statement, participants emphasized strengthening stability in Afghanistan and expressed their readiness to help achieve it if the Afghan side declares a need.

They underlined the importance of continuing economic and trade relations with Afghanistan with the aim of improving the livelihoods of the people of that country and pointed out the need for the country’s integration into the political and economic trends of the region.

Expressing security concerns, they announced and emphasized their readiness to assist Afghanistan in combating terrorism, drug trafficking, and human trafficking.

The representatives further highlighted the international community’s responsibility to lift sanctions and release Afghanistan’s frozen assets, support the return of Afghan citizens from neighboring countries, and provide conditions for their dignified return.

They supported all ongoing efforts to reduce tensions between Afghanistan and Pakistan, expressed readiness to help strengthen these initiatives, and called on both countries to return to the negotiating table to resolve their differences through diplomatic channels.

On Sunday, Iran’s Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi, during a high-level meeting titled “Afghanistan Developments Review,” attended by special representatives, said Afghanistan’s stability depends on its integration into regional political and economic frameworks, urging cooperation among neighboring countries instead of reliance on outside interventions.

The high-stakes meeting comes as relations between Pakistan and Afghanistan have sharply deteriorated in recent months, amid escalating border tensions and mutual accusations of harboring militants.

Kabul accused Islamabad of carrying out drone strikes on October 9 that killed several people in the Afghan capital, vowing retaliation in response.

The following days saw heavy cross-border clashes that left dozens of soldiers, civilians, and militants dead on both sides before Qatar brokered a ceasefire on October 19.

However, the deal has since been followed by several rounds of fruitless negotiations hosted by Qatar, Turkey, and Saudi Arabia in an effort to secure a more lasting peace.

 

Iran, Belarus sign cooperation agreements during Minsk talks

The agreements included joint declarations on opposing unilateral coercive measures and on strengthening the role of international law in global affairs, as well as a foreign ministry cooperation program covering 2026–2030. Araghchi, who arrived in the Belarusian capital early Monday, also met President Alexander Lukashenko during the visit.

Speaking at a joint news conference, he described the talks as constructive and said relations between Iran and Belarus had remained friendly and mutually beneficial since Belarus gained independence.

The Iranian foreign minister said the two countries share similar positions on regional and international issues and cooperate closely in multilateral forums.

He thanked Belarus for condemning U.S. actions against Iran and for expressing solidarity with the Iranian people. Araghchi said recent reciprocal visits by senior officials had accelerated political and economic ties, citing meetings held over the past year.

He added that Tehran and Minsk intend to expand cooperation through regional groupings including the Eurasian Economic Union, the Shanghai Cooperation Organization and BRICS.

Both Iran and Belarus are subject to Western sanctions, and Araghchi said the two governments would continue coordinating efforts in international organizations to counter what they consider illegal and unjust measures.

New MI6 head warns of growing Russian threat

Kremlin

Blaise Metreweli, giving her first speech in the job, is expected to say the UK faces a new “age of uncertainty” where the rules of conflict are being rewritten, particularly in light of wider Kremlin aggression after the invasion of Ukraine.

“The export of chaos is a feature, not a bug, in the Russian approach to international engagement,” the agency’s first female chief will argue, and “until [President Vladimir] Putin is forced to change his calculus” it is expected to continue.

Similar comments about the scale of the threat, particularly from Russia, are expected to be made by Air Chief Marshal Richard Knighton, the chief of the defence staff, who is due to say in a separate speech that “the situation is more dangerous than I have known during my career” and call for the country as a whole to be “stepping up”.

Their pre-released remarks come as Prime Minister Keir Starmer is due to fly to Berlin for an emergency summit with European leaders, including Ukraine’s President, Volodymyr Zelensky, as well as President Donald Trump’s special envoy Steve Witkoff in an effort to persuade the US to accept an alternative European peace plan for Ukraine.

Russia is identified as an acute threat by Metreweli in her speech, due to be released in full on Monday afternoon, with an “aggressive, expansionist, and revisionist” mindset that has led to Vladimir Putin ordering the invasion of its neighbour, and deploying aggressive supporting tactics across Europe.

“Putin should be in no doubt: our support is enduring. The pressure we apply on Ukraine’s behalf will be sustained,” the spy chief is expected to say, though the diplomatic reality of the past month is that the US position is uncertain, with Trump and Witkoff previously favouring Russian demands.

Threats faced by the UK include the attempt to kill Sergei and Yulia Skripal in Salisbury in 2018 with a nerve toxin, which led to the death of the British woman Dawn Sturgess. A public inquiry into the death of Sturgess, who accidentally picked up the poison bottle, concluded this month that the Russian president was “morally responsible”.

They also include Russian efforts to use artificial intelligence to create disinformation on a vast scale, to create online videos aimed at undermining public support for Ukraine or spreading false rumours about the health of the Princess of Wales, as highlighted in a recent speech by the foreign secretary, Yvette Cooper.

Six Bulgarians living in the UK were jailed in May for their part in a spy plot, which included the hostile surveillance of an investigative journalist known for Kremlin exposés across Europe and an attempt to retrieve the phone numbers of Ukrainian soldiers thought to be training in Germany.

However, in the advance excerpts, there was no explicit mention of China, other than to refer to last week’s sanctioning of two companies based in the country accused of engaging in indiscriminate hacking against the UK and its allies.

Ministers are still grappling with whether to allow China to build a new super-embassy at Royal Mint Court in London, while the prime minister is hoping to visit Beijing in January before Trump goes there in April.

Knighton, the country’s top military officer since September, is also expected to emphasise the threat from Russia to both the UK and the NATO military alliance, in his first annual lecture at the Royal United Services Institute thinktank.

“The war in Ukraine shows Putin’s willingness to target neighbouring states, including their civilian populations,” he is expected to say, arguing that Moscow wants to “challenge, limit, divide and ultimately destroy NATO”.

He will argue the long-term success of the armed forces relies on reconnecting with society so that defence becomes “a higher national priority for all of us”, with more Britons becoming involved.

Metreweli took over from Richard Moore as the chief of MI6, or C, in October. Previously she was MI6’s head of its technology and innovation department, or Q, and spent most of her career in the Middle East and Europe.

The new leader will also emphasise that the international spy agency has to remain on top of trends in computing, traditionally the domain of its sister agency GCHQ, as well as maintain the effective use of human sources of intelligence, its traditional trade.

“Mastery of technology must infuse everything we do. Not just in our labs, but in the field, in our tradecraft, and even more importantly, in the mindset of every officer. We must be as comfortable with lines of code as we are with human sources, as fluent in Python as we are in multiple languages,” she is expected to say.

The pre-released excerpts highlighted more general reference to the moral dimension of high-tech power, though allies said this was not a coded criticism of Donald Trump’s White House, but rather a call for a whole of society approach to technological development.

“The defining challenge of the 21st century is not simply who wields the most powerful technologies, but who guides them with the greatest wisdom. Our security, our prosperity, and our humanity depend on it,” the new chief will add.

The spy chief is expected to state that “we all have choices to make ahead” and that “it will be our rediscovery of our shared humanity, our ability to listen, and our courage that will determine how our future unfolds”.

 

Italy calls on Europe to strengthen defence as US signals pullback

Giorgia Meloni

Speaking at Castel Sant’Angelo in Rome, Meloni said Trump had made clear that the US intends to disengage from Europe and that Europeans must organise their own defence.

“Trump has said most emphatically that the US intends to disengage and Europeans must organise to defend themselves: hello Europe,” Meloni stated.

“For eighty years we outsourced our security to the US pretending it was free, but there was a price to pay and that price is called conditioning. Freedom has a price.”

Meloni’s comments come amid tensions between the EU and the Trump administration.

She called for a stronger European defence structure capable of engaging with global powers on equal terms.

“We have spoken in unsuspected times of the need to strengthen our defence and security capacity and claimed when no one else did the need to finally create a European NATO norm of equal strength and respect to the American one,” she added.

 

Iran calls on IAEA to clarify inspection protocols for facilities damaged by military attacks

Mohammad Eslami

Speaking to IRNA on the sidelines of an event unveiling new achievements at Iran’s Nuclear Science and Technology Research Institute, Eslami was responding to recent remarks by IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi about resuming inspections in Iran.

He said inspections had already been carried out at facilities that were not attacked, but stressed that sites hit by US military strikes in June require a clear and specific protocol.

“The agency has neither issued a condemnation nor presented any inspection guidelines for such cases, yet it claims it wants to inspect,” Eslami said, adding that external pressure from Israel, European countries and the US would not affect Iran’s position.

Eslami noted that Iran’s nuclear facilities are fully registered with and monitored by the IAEA, arguing that the current situation could affect any country.

He said now is the time for the agency to explain its responsibilities and procedures, rather than raising new questions.

Separately, Eslami said Iran’s nuclear products, including radiopharmaceuticals and heavy water derivatives, are exported to dozens of countries and hold a competitive position in global markets.

Ayatollah Khamenei’s adviser reaffirms Iran’s firm support for Lebanon’s Hezbollah

Ali Akbar Velayati

During a meeting in Tehran with Seyyed Abdullah Safi al-Din, Hezbollah’s representative in Iran, Velayati highlighted the movement’s strategic standing, saying Hezbollah, as one of the most important pillars of the Resistance Front, plays a fundamental role in confronting Zionism.

He added that the Islamic Republic of Iran, under the leadership and directives of the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution, will steadfastly continue its support for this valuable and self-sacrificing force on the front lines of resistance.

For his part, Safi al-Din presented an overview of the situation in Lebanon, Hezbollah, and the Axis of Resistance, stressing that Hezbollah today is stronger than ever and fully prepared to defend Lebanon’s territorial integrity and its people, and will by no means lay down its arms.

Referring to repeated violations of the ceasefire, he said the Zionist regime and its supporters should know that whenever Hezbollah decides, it will respond decisively.

The Hezbollah representative also expressed gratitude for the comprehensive support of the Islamic Republic of Iran, particularly that of the Suprene Leader of the Islamic Revolution, for Hezbollah.