Thursday, December 25, 2025
Home Blog Page 4624

Q&A: Iran’s top science official strives for a Silicon Valley spirit

Sattari

The journal Science has conducted an interview with Iranian Vice President for Science and Technology Dr. Sorena Sattari on the sidelines of the 70th session of the United Nations General Assembly. The Islamic Republic News Agency published a translated version of the interview on October 3. The following is the original interview that sciencemag.org posted online:

During his two years in office, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani has filled his cabinet with Ph.D.-trained technocrats. One of the youngest is Sorena Sattari, the vice president for science and technology. A mechanical engineer by training, Sattari, 43, has been a forceful proponent of yoking science more tightly to the economy and says he would like to imbue Iran with an “entrepreneurial spirit.” His Innovation and Prosperity Fund has handed out $600 million in low-interest loans to 1650 technology startups and to other firms seeking to branch out in new directions.

He has not turned his back on basic research, however. He cites as “a point of pride” for his country the $30 million Iranian National Observatory, a world-class, 3.4-meter optical telescope that is expected to see first light in four or five years. Backers credit him with helping get the long-delayed project back on track earlier this year (Science, September 4, p. 1042). Sattari spoke with Science last week on the sidelines of the United Nations General Assembly. This interview has been edited for brevity and clarity.

Q: Your father, Mansour Sattari, was commander of the Iranian Air Force during the Iran-Iraq war. That was a difficult time to come of age.

A: I spent a lot of time on Air Force bases during the war. Before the revolution [in 1979], Iran had one of the most advanced air forces in the world. But when U.S. military advisers left the country during the revolution, we realized we didn’t understand the technology. I think that’s why Saddam Hussein attacked us. He thought we would survive only three months. Iranian pilots were flying aircraft that weren’t reliable because they weren’t maintained well. But we learned how to stand on our own feet. Two days before [the] war ended, we had our last air combat with Iraq. For the first time, we shot down a MiG-29. We used an F-14 aircraft with an Iranian missile. We learned how to build new weapons. That was the start of the Iranian missile program. It was a result of international sanctions.

Q: The war and sanctions hardened the Iranian psyche.

A: The war was difficult, but what was harder was what went on under the skin of society. Many women lost their husbands, and parents lost their sons. Sometimes I get scared when the phone rings at night, because I think it must be very bad news. That fear comes from those times.

Q: Your father died in a military plane crash in 1995. Did you think to follow his path into the military?

A: My father didn’t want me to go into the military and didn’t ask me to. He was martyred when I was 22.

Q: You had just finished your master’s degree in mechanical engineering at Sharif University of Technology.

A: After I lost my father, I had to take care of my family. I left school and started working in the oil and gas ministry. After I collected enough money for my family, I went back to Sharif and completed my Ph.D.

Q: In December 2013, Iran put a monkey named Fargam [“auspicious”] into orbit and safely brought him back to Earth. What’s next for the space program?

A: We will have to change how we manage the space program, both the technology side and the business side. We’re hoping that with [the] help of foreign companies, we can commercialize the program.

Q: Iran and Russia are talking about jointly developing remote-sensing satellites for environmental monitoring. Does this represent a deepening of scientific ties?

A: We are now becoming very serious in our relationship with Russia. We have formed for the first time a joint commission on science and technology cooperation, which is much higher level than our economic joint commission. It’s headed by the deputy prime minister of Russia and myself. For the first time, science and technology is driving the relationship between our countries.

Q: You said recently that “the most important responsibility” of your vice presidency is changing Iran’s oil-based economy into a knowledge-based economy.

A: Before sanctions, our government got 85% of its revenues from oil. This year, we got less than 25% from oil. But we have not succumbed to this pressure. Resistance is ingrained in our nature; it is in Iranian genes. Our mindset has changed because of the sanctions. Now, we believe in investing in science and technology. Innovation is essential to creating a knowledge economy.

Q: You’ve talked about privatizing Iran’s research institutes. Do you have a concrete plan?

A: I have a mental model. There must be a difference between grants for pure research and support for projects that have potential to become a business. Government funds should be used to expand the boundaries of science. We have wasted a lot of money on institutes that are not contributing to the economy. We thought that we could use oil money to simply buy whatever technology we need. We thought that if we have a building and equipment, we could achieve results. But you have to acquire expertise. In many of our institutes, frankly, we need a new way of thinking.

Q: In a speech at the University of Tehran in October 2013, President Rouhani pledged to increase academic freedom at Iranian universities. Are conditions improving?

A: It’s unprecedented for an Iranian president to walk in and out of a university and talk to students without some sort of protests. We never experienced this before. It shows how supportive the majority of university students are of his policies. The university atmosphere has become much better compared with the past. Iran is becoming more open. If the United States wants to create a serious scientific relationship, this is the time.

Q: This summer you were appointed to the Supreme Council of Cyberspace. One of its tasks is to accelerate the launch of a national intranet. What is the purpose of this network?

A: Many countries are building similar networks. It will increase the speed and security of information transfer. And this does not have political intentions behind it.

Q: The council also is supposed to pay special attention to “cleaning and securing” the nation’s cyberspace, and promoting Islamic and Iranian norms. Iran now blocks Facebook, Twitter, and other social media websites. Will achieving the council’s goal mean more aggressive Internet censorship?

A: The Internet has a good face and a bad face. In the Middle East we have lots of challenges. For example, we have [the Islamic State group] recruiting on the Internet. It’s very scary to see what’s happening in the region. We want to make sure our data hubs remain in Iran. We don’t want messages to go out of the country and then come back in. We want more security.

Q: According to the Supreme Council of the Cultural Revolution’s master plan for science, “the revival of the great Islamic civilization” is “contingent upon all-out progress in science.” What does that mean?

A: It means that we want to be the superpower of science and technology in the region. And we also want to be No. 1 in the Islamic world as well.

Q: Who is No. 1 now?

A: Overall, Iran is No. 1. [Smiles.] Now, we are aiming for the whole world.

FM Zarif meetings in New York

Zarif

Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif and Arab League Secretary General Nabil Al-Arabi in a meeting on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly in New York on Friday discussed the recent developments in the Middle East region.

They also emphasized the need for cooperation to settle regional crises, particularly those in Syria and Yemen.

Also on Friday, Zarif met with US Secretary of State John Kerry on the sidelines of the UN General Assembly meeting.

The two sides discussed ways to implement the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

It was their second meeting after the nuclear deal struck in Vienna on July 14, 2015, which led to the conclusion of JCPOA.

Zarif and Kerry’s first meeting was held on September 26.

Iran welcomes home bodies of Mina victims (Photos)

1

A ceremony was held in Tehran on Saturday to welcome the return to Iran of the bodies of 104 Iranian pilgrims killed in the Mina incident some ten days ago. Heads of the three branches of government, the Supreme Leader’s chief of staff as well as state and military officials were present in the ceremony which was held at the capital’s Mehrabad Airport. The Islamic Republic News Agency (IRNA) has released the following images of the homecoming of the bodies of Iranians died in the Mina crush:

 

Camps of Worriers outside Iranian parliament (Photos)

Worriers2

A group of Worriers [supporters of former President Ahmadinejad’s policies and critics of President Rouhani’s foreign policies, especially his nuclear approach] are still in their tents outside parliament in protest at the conclusion of the Iran nuclear deal. 

This comes as Tehran’s governor has said that the gathering outside the Islamic Consultative Assembly is illegal and Tehran police have asked the protestors to break up. The Worriers staged a sit-in on Monday (September 28) and launched a website to cover their protests.  

The protesters have also installed banners some of which read: JCPOA is the Trojan Horse of the USWhy an agreement, if sanctions are not to be lifted?; and The result of two years of [nuclear] negotiations: Sanctions will not be removed!

The following are the images Entekhab.ir released on Saturday (October 3) of the illegal sit-in by the Worriers:

Highlights of Ettela’at newspaper on October 3

Ettelaat

 “You need to bolster the country’s power so that the enemy cannot even think of attacking Iran,” said the Supreme Leader in a meeting with Army commanders.

Ayatollah Khamenei further said that the enemy is seeking the surrender of the Islamic establishment, adding that hostilities will not become history even if Iran backs down.

 Tehran’s Friday payer leader has said that the management of Hajj should be changed.

The Friday prayer leader also said that those responsible for the Mina tragedy should be immediately identified and brought to justice.

 The Taliban in Afghanistan have brought down a US Army cargo plane. Eleven people were killed in the crash.

The Taliban have claimed responsibility for the downing of the US C-130 transport plane.

 A commemorative ceremony will be held for the victims of the Mina tragedy in Tehran and Qom on orders of the Supreme Leader.

The number of Iranian pilgrims killed in the Mina tragedy has risen to 465.

 Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif has said that time has come for a new approach toward nuclear disarmament.

The UN secretary general has praised Iran’s initiative to designate an International Day for the Total Elimination of Nuclear Weapons.

 “The country is indebted to the competence and self-sacrifice of the war disabled,” said Dr. Mohammad-Ali Javadi, a renowned ophthalmologist.

 The tragic death of the Persepolis captain

 

Critical remarks about Rouhani’s trip and Zarif are out of spite

un

An Iranian expert in international affairs has taken an analytical look at the addresses made by the US, Russian and Iranian presidents at the General Assembly, how they fared in their appearances at the UN and where they stood on efforts to settle the Syrian crisis.

Khabaronline.ir on September 30 published an interview with Ali Bigdeli, also a university professor. The following is the translation of what Bigdeli said:

US President’s Speech

The speech by the US president can be studied from two perspectives. The first angle has to do with eloquence and how to connect the subjects and topics. The US president had a good performance on that front.

The second part [which focuses on the subjects] came with conflicting remarks. What Mr. Obama said in his address, especially about Russia, Iran and Cuba, does not conform to US policies. For instance, Mr. Obama said that the US was not seeking to isolate Russia, but this is what is exactly happening on the ground.

As for Iran and Cuba, his rhetoric was less fiery, but his words on Russia were more pointed. On top of that, Obama’s comments such as “[…] is what allowed us to become the most powerful nation in the world”, and “[…] I lead the strongest military that the world has ever known […]”, etc.” were not in keeping with the core of his speech.

Syria in UN speeches

A sort of harmony was evident in the speeches of Messrs. Obama, Putin and Rouhani as far as the future of Syria was concerned. They agreed that the question of ISIL should be settled with the Syrian government in power and then they can move on to the question of the Syrian government.

We’ve witnessed that the US administration has recently adopted a more flexible approach toward the Syrian situation. Washington earlier lent support to any solution to the Syrian crisis which would lead to the departure of Assad from office, but now the United States has agreed to put the fight against ISIL ahead of the presence or absence of Assad [in the future of Syria].

Russian President’s Speech

President Putin’s UN speech was heroic. In his address, Putin organized a show of force suggesting that the US cannot settle the problems and crises by sidelining Russia. On Syria, Mr. Putin said that Russia should be part of any plan to defuse the crisis there. In fact, Putin has put the US in a tight corner. The US has come to realize that it cannot keep up the fight against ISIL without Putin’s help.

The developments in Crimea and Eastern Ukraine can be explained in the same manner. All in all, I think Putin performed well in his UN General Assembly address thanks to Russia’s new position in regional equations.

Iranian President’s Speech

Iran’s president did a perfect job at the UN General Assembly. It was obvious that Mr. Rouhani sought to speak cautiously about different topics and avoid aggressiveness and going to extremes. This approach is in the best interest of Iran. Any radical views by Iran would benefit Israel.

In his speech, Mr. Rouhani focused on three questions. Firstly, he announced that the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) is a closed question and now Iran has opened its doors to the whole world.

Second, the president discussed the unjust sanctions imposed on the country. Third, he said that the decisions made on the Middle East’s crises and problems are not feasible and cannot be implemented without Iran having a role.

A controversial handshake

Since the Iranian and American delegations had repeatedly announced that they had no plans for a meeting between the Iranian and US presidents, this encounter [between Foreign Minister Zarif and President Obama] was not a preplanned contact.

Mr. Zarif is well versed in the principles of diplomacy and consular etiquette. When Mr. Zarif ran into Obama in the UN corridor, he could not have made a U-turn. The diplomatic protocols required the two to shake hands.

The critical comments some have made at home are baseless. These criticisms have been leveled [at the foreign minister] out of spite and are mere excuses. Issues between Iran and the US are so much complicated that an accidental handshake can do little to solve them. We need to evaluate the handshake as a measure taken out of respect and courtesy.

Deft diplomacy in dealing with Mina tragedy

Rouhani_UN

Critics of the Rouhani administration have said that the president’s failure to cut short his New York trip immediately after the Mina tragedy amounts to disrespect for the Iranian people, citing the fact that following incidents much smaller in scale than the Mina stampede the heads of state from other countries have immediately cancelled their trips and returned home to show sympathy with their people.

Even worse, Mr. Zarif did not call off his trip to come back home, the opponents of the eleventh government say. The managing editor of one newspaper has said in an interview that US President Barack Obama cancelled his annual summer holiday after news got out that a number of students have been killed in a shooting spree.

What you read above is part of an opinion piece by Musa Alizadeh Tabatabaei, a senior expert in international relations Fararu.com published on September 29 on the government’s shrewd diplomacy in dealing with the Mina incident. The following is the translation of the rest of the piece:

There are some considerations as far as the remarks of the critics go. There are different analyses and scenarios about the tragedy in Mina. One suggests that in the buildup to the first trip [since the conclusion of the nuclear deal] by the Iranian president to the United Nations – a big diplomatic meeting point of world leaders where heads of state were trying to have a meeting with Iran’s president – the Al Saud and Zionist regimes, enraged by a nuclear agreement between Iran and six world powers, got extremely concerned, seeking to overshadow President Rouhani’s trip and its achievements.

This scenario does not seem to have a leg to stand on, but it is quite clear that cancellation of the president’s trip would simply serve the interests of the opponents of the Islamic Republic of Iran, especially the banned MKO grouping and the Zionists who do not want the voice of the Iranian nation be heard all over the world.

One of the critics has cited cancellation of Obama’s holiday at home following the shooting incident in a US state; this sounds to be a move to divert the attention of the public opinion.

First, it is surprising that a local critic of President Rouhani views the US president as a role model for the president of the Islamic Republic of Iran.

Second, the examples the critics have presented draw an irrelevant analogy, because the incidents the critics have mentioned have all happened inside the country. When an incident happens somewhere inside the country, it’s natural for the president to cancel his trip and routine schedule to manage the crisis and regulate [coordination] work among different ministries and provinces/states.

Third, the US president cancelled his annual leave, and not his overseas trip.

Fourth, cancellation of an overseas trip when it focuses on bilateral relations is more frequent than a trip to an international organization where multilateral relations are discussed, especially to the United Nations whose General Assembly is held once in a year.

Fifth, if the esteemed president had cancelled his New York trip and returned home, the critics would have stirred yet another controversy blaming him for failure to tap into the opportunity that had arisen at the UN General Assembly which serves as an international bully pulpit to reveal the depth of the Mina tragedy.

The Mina tragedy is different from a shooting incident in the US, because the former occurred outside Iran and its management inside the country was impossible. Despite the fact that the Mina incident took place outside Iran, the president tasked his Cabinet and first vice-president with pursuing the case. No more measures – than what have been adopted so far – would have been taken in dealing with the Hajj incident even if the president had returned home [halfway through his UN trip].

Given [not-so-friendly] ties between Iran and Saudi Arabia and the obstacles the latter throws in the way of Iran’s diplomatic measures to attend to those Iranian pilgrims injured in Mina, even if the president had not had any plan for a UN trip to take part in the General Assembly, he would have been expected to seize such an opportunity, travel to New York to place more diplomatic pressure on Saudi Arabia.

His government did just that. The president and his foreign minister built on their interviews, meetings and speeches [the president’s at the UN General Assembly] to highlight the Saudi government’s mismanagement of Hajj rituals and remind world nations of the incompetence of the Saudis as far as the handling of Hajj [the biggest Muslim congregation] is concerned.

Chief among what the government did was the president’s address at the UN General Assembly which opened with his criticism of Saudi Arabia over the Mina incident. Would Iran have achieved such a breakthrough if the president had cut short his trip?

The president drew on smart planning to foil the plots of the enemies of Iran and Iranians: Preventing the Iranian president from addressing the General Assembly; second, he cut his New York trip and returned home immediately after his UN speech to attend a ceremony to welcome the return home of the bodies of the pilgrims killed in Mina incident and express sympathy with the [bereaved] families of the victims.

It is surprising that the critics lay the blame for the Mina tragedy at the president’s door instead of lashing out at the Al Saud for their incompetence in the management of Hajj. What the critics have done will play into the hands of Saudi rulers.

What motivates an American woman to translate Iranian books on Sacred Defense?

13930717000298_PhotoL

Caroline Croskery, an orientalist and an American researcher at University of California at Los Angeles, has so far translated over 15 books by Iranian authors into English. Her latest translation is a collection of short stories on the Iran-Iraq War by Ahmad Dehghan.

The following are some of the books Croskery has translated: We Are All Sunflowers and A Heart Bigger Than the World by Erfan Nazarahari, Democracy or Demo-Crazy and In the Twinkling of an Eye by Seyyed Mehdi Shojaei, Red Fish by Katayoun Riahi, The Big Clay Jar and A Sweet Jam and one more title by Houshang Moradi Kermani and Stillness in a Storm by Saeed Ramezani. One book by Pejman Rahimzadeh and another by Afshin Yadollahi are also on the list of her translations.

The American translator who was present in the 27th and 28th editions of Tehran International Book Fair is a Farsi interpreter for the Los Angeles County Superior Courts.

She has recently translated a collection of short stories about the Sacred Defense by Ahmad Dehghan entitled A Vital Killing which is to be unveiled at the 2015 Frankfurt Book Fair in October.

The following is the translation of an interview with Ms. Croskery Tasnim News Agency published on September 28:

Ms. Croskery, you have recently translated a book entitled A Vital Killing by Ahmad Dehghan which is a collection of short stories about the Iran-Iraq war. Based on the experience you acquired from such translation, to what extent do you think the concept of Sacred Defense and the Iran-Iraq war as reflected in the Persian literature is appealing to American readers?    

In the US where I live, whenever I talk with people about my translations from Farsi into English, they are amazed. A majority of them have a lot of questions about Iran and the Iranian people. They know that what Western media depict is not the whole truth and are eager to learn more about Iran.

That’s why I choose the books from a wide range of topics and titles by the best Iranian authors. My goal is to play an effective role in reintroducing Iran, its people and wonderful culture to the world.

What do you think about A Vital Killing?

I am extremely happy that I have translated a book by Ahmad Dehghan. I picked A Vital Killing for the title of the translated version; vital because it is necessary and at the same time life-saving. The collection of short stories paints a painful image of the disastrous impact of war on a country against the backdrop of the humanity of its people.

How must have found Iran’s war literature different and appealing to translate a book about it.

My personal intention of translating war books is to remind the world that Iran is a country with refined, noble and peace-loving people. The Iran-Iraq war was not merely a brief conflict between two unimportant countries; nor was it a product of Shiite-Sunni divisions. The public should bear in mind that it was an imposed war triggered by the interference in the internal affairs of a mighty country by major powers who sought to have a hold over the balance of power in the world. Such a policy still persists in the world and its wrongness is being proved.

The book by Ahmad Dehghan narrates stories that tell the truth about the Iranian people. Such stories show the power of people during war. The stories in the collection narrate human actions in a way which is comprehensible to everyone.

Do you adopt a special method in translating Iranian books into English? Given that your insight into the Iranian culture is gained through the books you translate, how do you translate?

I first read the book attentively, because I believe a translator should know the book inside out to be able to translate it. At times when it’s impossible to find an equivalent or there is no appropriate equivalent, I prefer to contact the author to appreciate the concept thoroughly. Then I add some explanations in the target language to convey the message.

Iran hits back: Senior Bahraini diplomat ordered to leave

fac5ef53-e9e2-4433-90a6-be47da3db30f

Iran has ordered a top Bahraini diplomat to leave the Islamic Republic after declaring him persona non grata, amid baseless allegations by the Manama regime against Tehran.

In a statement on Friday, Iran’s Foreign Ministry gave the second highest ranking diplomat at the Bahraini embassy in Tehran, Bassam Dalhan al-Dosari, 72 hours to leave Iran.

The Foreign Ministry dismissed Bahrain’s unfounded allegations that Tehran is interfering in the internal affairs of the kingdom of Bahrain.

Manama had accused Tehran of forming and arming groups opposed to the Al Khalifa regime.

In a statement on Thursday, the Bahraini Foreign Ministry recalled its ambassador to Iran and ordered the Islamic Republic’s charge d’affaires in Manama to leave the tiny Persian Gulf kingdom within 72 hours.

The Bahraini Foreign Ministry said it asked the ambassador, Rashid Saad al-Dosari, to return, and declared the Iranian diplomat, Mohammad Reza Babaei, persona non grata and ordered him to depart.

The decision was taken a day after Bahraini officials claimed that they had arrested a number of people over allegations that they had links with Iran and Iraq for ‘terrorist activities.’

A Bahraini Interior Ministry statement said the Al Khalifa regime forces had also uncovered a large stash of weapons at a house in the village of Nuwaidrat, located about 10 km (six miles) south of the capital, Manama.

The cache purportedly included a ton and a half of powerful explosive materials, automatic rifles, pistols and hand grenades.

This is not the first time the Al Khalifa regime has sought to implicate Iran over the ongoing instability in Bahrain.

Iran has repeatedly dismissed the accusations, saying the blame game Bahrain is playing is aimed at covering up the Arab country’s internal problems.

The Islamic Republic has urged the Bahraini government to stop pursuing a security approach toward the tensions in the country and solve its problems through dialogue.

[…]

Mina human crush culprits must face justice: Iran cleric

Movahedi-Kermani

An Iranian cleric has said the main culprits of the September 24 tragedy in Mina, Saudi Arabia, must face justice for the human crush that killed hundreds of pilgrims during the Hajj rituals.

“The management of Hajj should undoubtedly change,” said Ayatollah Mohammad Ali Movahedi Kermani in an address to worshippers at Friday prayer in Tehran.

He added that the Mina tragedy has left a mark of disgrace on the Saudi regime which cannot be removed easily.

The cleric said the Saudi police are certainly responsible for the incident.

“Muslim countries must investigate [the incident] and a fact-finding mission must be set up and the reason behind the closure of the routes [leading to Mina] should be determined,” he said.

He added that many pilgrims died due to lack of water in the scorching heat.

Ayatollah Movahedi Kermani said the tragedy showed Saudi authorities’ lack of competence and their inability to manage the rituals.

He also called on the Saudi officials to consult with Muslim countries regarding the management of the pilgrimage.

[…]