Wednesday, December 31, 2025
Home Blog Page 586

UN special envoy warns war in Syria ‘has not ended’, citing clashes between various armed groups

Syria War

“There have been significant hostilities in the last two weeks, before a ceasefire was brokered,” Geir Pedersen told the UN Security Council in New York on Tuesday, warning that a military escalation could be “catastrophic”.

The remarks come after the Syrian National Army (SNA), a group of fighters backed by Turkiye, has battled with the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) in the wake of al-Assad’s removal.

The SDF is the main ally in a United States-led coalition against ISIS (ISIL). It is spearheaded by the People’s Protection Units (YPG), which Ankara sees as an extension of the Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) armed group that it outlaws and that has fought the Turkish state for 40 years.

Last week, SNA fighters seized the northern city of Manbij from the SDF, which then headed east of the Euphrates river as a US-mediated ceasefire came into effect.

Meanwhile, the members of the UNSC in a statement called for the implementation of “an inclusive and Syrian-led and Syrian-owned political process” that they said should meet the legitimate aspirations of all Syrians, protect all of them and “enable them to peacefully, independently and democratically determine their own futures”.

They emphasised battling “terrorism” across the country, stressed that Syria must abide by council resolutions on non-conventional weapons, and reiterated support for UN peacekeepers and the inviolability of diplomatic premises.

Separately, a US State Department spokesman said the ceasefire in northern Syria had been extended until the end of this week.

“We continue to engage with the SDF, with Turkey about a path forward,” State Department spokesperson Matthew Miller said, adding it was not in the interest of any party to see increased conflict in Syria.

Later on Tuesday, SDF commander Mazloum Abdi said in a post on X that the group was ready to present a proposal for a “demilitarised zone” in the northern city of Kobane, with the redeployment of security forces under US supervision.

He said the proposal aims to address Turkiye’s security concerns and ensure permanent stability in the area.

There was no immediate comment from Turkiye, the SNA or the US.

Pedersen also called on the UNSC to ensure that Israel “cease all settlement activity in the occupied Syrian Golan”.

Pedersen noted Israel has conducted more than 350 strikes on Syria following the departure of the former government, including a major strike on Tartous.

“Such attacks place a battered civilian population at further risk and undermine the prospects of an orderly political transition,” he said.

The UN envoy warned against plans announced by Israel’s cabinet to expand settlements inside the Golan, occupied by Israel since 1967 and annexed in 1981.

On Tuesday, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu held a security briefing inside the UN-patrolled buffer zone in the Golan Heights that Israel seized earlier this month.

“Israel must cease all settlement activities in the occupied Syrian Golan, which are illegal. Attacks on Syria’s sovereignty and territorial integrity must stop,” said Pedersen.

Pederson also called for “broad support” to end the Western-backed sanctions imposed on Syria in order to allow for reconstruction in the war-ravaged country.

“Concrete movement on an inclusive political transition will be key in ensuring Syria receives the economic support it needs,” Pedersen stated.

“The needs are immense and could only be addressed with broad support, including a smooth end to sanctions, appropriate action on designations, too, and full reconstruction.”

Western countries are wrestling with their approach to Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS), which spearheaded the takeover of Damascus and is a former al-Qaeda affiliate.

Despite moderating its rhetoric in recent months, HTS has been designated as a “terrorist” group by many Western governments.

Israeli PM says to occupy Syria buffer zone until ‘another arrangement’

Netanyahu made the comments on Tuesday from the summit of Mount Hermon, known as Jabal al-Shaykh in Arabic, the highest peak in the area — inside Syria, about 10 kilometers (6 miles) from the border with the strategic Golan Heights.

He was joined by the Israeli minister for military affairs, Israel Katz, Chief of Staff Lieutenant General Herzi Halevi, head of the so-called internal security service Shin Bet, Ronen Bat, and Northern Command chief Major General Uri Gordin.

Netanyahu reiterated that Israel would remain in the area “until another arrangement can be found that guarantees Israel’s security”.

The prime minister added he had been on the same mountaintop 53 years ago as a soldier, but the summit’s importance to the Tel Aviv regime’s security has only increased given recent events.

It appeared to be the first time a sitting Israeli leader had set foot that far into Syrian territory.

For his part, Katz said Israeli forces would remain on the Syrian summit of Mount Hermon for “as long as necessary”.

He added, “We will stay here for as long as necessary,” asserting that deployment of Israeli troops to the strategically significant summit “strengthens security.”

“Mount Hermon’s summit is Israel’s eyes for identifying near and distant threats. From here, we can see Hezbollah positions in Lebanon to the right, and Damascus to the left.”

Israeli military forces captured the UN-patrolled buffer zone in the Golan Heights hours after armed groups took control of the Syrian capital of Damascus on December 8.

Israel has been widely and vehemently condemned over termination of the 1974 ceasefire agreement with Syria, and exploiting the chaos in the Arab nation in the wake of Assad’s downfall to make a land grab.

The buffer zone in the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights was created by the United Nations after the 1973 Arab-Israeli War. A UN force of about 1,100 troops had patrolled the area since then.

Stephane Dujarric, spokesman for UN Secretary General Antonio Guterres, stated on Tuesday that the presence of Israeli soldiers, however long it lasts, violates the deal that established the buffer zone.

That agreement “needs to be respected, and occupation is occupation, whether it lasts a week, a month or a year, it remains occupation,” Dujarric pointed out.

Iran defends nuclear enrichment program against IAEA criticism

IAEA

The assertion by Kazem Gharibabadi came on Tuesday night in response to remarks made by the IAEA Director General Rafael Grossi, who claimed that “Iran is enriching uranium close to military levels and is rapidly moving towards becoming a nuclear state.”

Grossi also suggested that the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) nuclear agreement is no longer relevant and requires a new framework.

In a tweet on X, Gharibabadi countered, stating that the IAEA chief should rely on factual and technical reports from agency inspectors rather than hypothetical scenarios.

The Iranian deputy foreign minister emphasized that Iran’s peaceful use of nuclear energy, including enrichment, is recognized internationally.

Criticizing Grossi’s remarks as politically charged, Gharibabadi highlighted that the failure of JCPOA parties to meet their commitments and the US’s unilateral withdrawal from the deal are the root causes of the current situation.

He stressed that constructive dialogue based on mutual respect and balanced commitments, including lifting sanctions, is the sustainable solution.

Israeli DM wants control over Gaza amid ceasefire deal push

Israeli Army

In a post made on X on Tuesday, Israel Katz said his government would “have security control over Gaza with full freedom of action just as it did in Judea and Samaria”, using the Israeli name for the occupied West Bank.

“We will not allow a return to the reality of before 7 October,” he added.

His comments came as Israeli daily newspaper Ynet reported that the military plans to maintain a presence in areas it currently occupies to prevent displaced Palestinians from returning to their homes in northern Gaza.

The report added that this meant that Israel was adopting the controversial “Generals’ Plan”, also known as the Eiland Plan, which would leave the area’s security under Israeli military control.

Human rights activists and experts have warned against the Israeli onslaught in northern Gaza, saying that it is “genocidal” and a “perversion of law”.

Proposed and promoted by a group of senior Israeli army reservists, the scheme involves forcibly displacing the entire population of northern Gaza and then besieging the area, including blocking the entry of humanitarian supplies, to starve out anyone left.

The plan’s stated aim is to defeat Hamas in the north, but it views civilians who choose to stay as legitimate military targets. Since 5 October, northern Gaza has been subject to a brutal siege, barring all humanitarian aid from entering.

Meanwhile, talks to secure a ceasefire and a prisoner exchange deal between Israel and Hamas have been progressing, according to several reports.

Hamas announced on Tuesday that it believes ceasefire negotiations have been productive enough for a ceasefire to be agreed, but only if Israel does not impose further conditions.

“The Islamic Resistance Movement, Hamas, confirms that in light of the serious and positive discussions taking place in Doha today, under the auspices of the Qatari and Egyptian mediators, reaching an agreement on a ceasefire and prisoner exchange is possible if the occupation stops adding new conditions,” the group said in a statement.

White House National Security Council spokesperson John Kirby also told Fox News on Tuesday that the deal is “getting closer”.

“We believe – and the Israelis have said this – that we’re getting closer, and no doubt about it, we believe that,” he added.

“But we also are cautious in our optimism,” he continued, stating, “We’ve been in this position before where we weren’t able to get it over the finish line.”

Israel’s war on Gaza has killed more than 45,000 people, most of the population has been driven from their homes multiple times and hundreds of thousands are at risk of famine.

Israel planning to conduct military operation against Yemen: KAN

Yemen Houthi

The Houthi movement, known officially as Ansar Allah, claimed to have struck a “military target” near Tel Aviv on Monday with a hypersonic ballistic missile.

The group’s military spokesman Yahya Saree declared in a televised address that the operation was a success, though Israeli media reported intercepting the missile before it entered its airspace.

The Houthis have been launching attacks against Israel since the outbreak of the war in Gaza last year. They say the attacks are in solidarity with Palestinians.

The Yemeni group has also targeted shipping lanes in the Red Sea, describing these operations as part of their efforts to pressure Israel into halting the war on Gaza.

Kan reported that the Israeli army recognised the escalating attacks from Yemen, claiming that it is “being orchestrated by Iran”.

“They are trying to promote significant damage to Israeli assets such as the seaports of Ashdod and Haifa, the power plants of the Israel Electric Corporation, and the gas rigs off the coast of Israel,” the broadcaster reported.

“The IDF (Israeli army) and the Air Force claim that it is necessary to act against the threat from Yemen, and this requires diverting intelligence attention and preparing operational arrays for this purpose,” it added.

Kan news has also indicated that such attacks from the Houthis were the group’s attempt at seizing “the lead in what remains of Iran’s evil axis in the region”.

“Iran is activating the Houthis, among other things, due to the availability of their capabilities,” the report noted.

The Houthi attacks against Israeli targets began on 19 October, 2023 and a month later they seized the Galaxy Leader carrier in the Red Sea off the coast of Hodeidah.

Galaxy Leader is owned by Tel Aviv-based Ray Shipping, and is registered in the UK’s Isle of Man, according to Lloyd’s List. Twenty five of the vessel’s crew members have been detained on board since then.

Israel called the capture of the Israel-owned ship an “act of terrorism”, while the United States and nine of its allies launched a naval task force to tackle Houthi attacks on western and Israeli-linked shipping last October.

The Houthis have continued their Red Sea attacks despite a campaign of air raids by the US-led military coalition since January to repel them.

Palestinians sue US gov’t over assistance to Israel’s military

The lawsuit, announced on Tuesday, accuses the Department of State of failing to implement a federal law that prohibits the transfer of funds to foreign military units engaged in gross violations such as extrajudicial killings and torture.

“The State Department’s calculated failure to apply the Leahy Law is particularly shocking in the face of the unprecedented escalation of Israeli [gross violations of human rights] since the Gaza War erupted on October 7, 2023,” the lawsuit reads.

Israel’s bombardment and ground operations in Gaza have killed more than 45,000 Palestinians since early October 2023, and the United Nations and the world’s leading rights groups have accused the Israeli military of carrying out war crimes, including genocide.

The lead plaintiff in the case, a Gaza teacher referred to by the pseudonym Amal Gaza, has been forcibly displaced seven times since the war began and 20 of her family members have been killed in Israeli attacks.

“My suffering and the unimaginable loss my family has endured would be significantly lessened if the US stopped providing military assistance to Israeli units committing gross violations of human rights,” she said in a statement accompanying the lawsuit.

The case centres around what’s known as the Leahy Law, a federal regulation that bars the US government from providing funds to foreign military units when there is “credible information” implicating them in gross violations of human rights.

Those violations include torture, extrajudicial killings, enforced disappearances and rape, the US State Department says in a factsheet explaining the law.

“We’re asking the government to obey the law,” Raed Jarrar, advocacy director at DAWN, a US nonprofit that campaigns for democracy and human rights in the Arab world and is supporting the plaintiffs in the case, told Al Jazeera.

For months, lawyers and human rights advocates have urged President Joe Biden’s administration to restrict assistance to the Israeli military amid multiple reports of violations against Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank.

Rights groups have documented Israel’s use of US-made weapons in several deadly attacks in Gaza, including indiscriminate strikes that killed dozens of Palestinian civilians.

Palestinians in the West Bank have also experienced a surge in deadly Israeli military and settler violence since the Gaza war began with the UN’s humanitarian office reporting that 770 Palestinians were killed there from October 7, 2023, to the end of November 2024.

The US provides Israel with at least $3.8bn in military assistance annually, and researchers at Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island, recently estimated that the Biden administration provided an additional $17.9bn since the start of the Gaza war.

Observers said that if the US were to cut off that assistance, Israel would not be able to continue with its war effort.

“The violations committed by Israel are so widespread – very severe – that most if not all Israel’s [army] units will actually be deemed ineligible for US military assistance” if the Leahy Law were applied, Jarrar stated.

“If the US were to stop sending weapons, there is no way for Israel to continue its military operations,” he added.

But efforts to pressure Washington to apply the Leahy Law to Israel have largely failed.

This year, the Biden administration considered cutting off assistance to an Israeli army unit notorious for its use of violence against Palestinians in the West Bank as well as its involvement in the death of an elderly Palestinian American.

However, the State Department ultimately determined that the Netzah Yehuda Battalion could continue to receive American military aid after it said allegations of abuse had been “effectively remediated”.

The Leahy Law includes an exception that allows the US to resume assistance if the secretary of state determines – and reports to Congress – that the foreign government has taken “effective steps to bring the responsible members of the security forces unit to justice”.

State Department spokesman Matthew Miller said in August that Israel had provided new information in the Netzah Yehuda case, but he did not provide details. The decision to continue funding the unit fuelled widespread criticism.

While the Leahy Law should be applied equally to countries around the world, experts say Washington has created a specific set of procedures – via what’s known as the Israel Leahy Vetting Forum (ILVF) – that benefits the top US ally.

The US applies “a unique, complex, time-consuming, high-level Leahy process” for Israel, Charles Blaha, a former State Department official who was responsible for implementing the Leahy Law, explained in a June column on the website Just Security.

For example, while Leahy Law decisions are typically made by lower-level US government experts, in the case of Israel, the vetting involves higher-level, in-person meetings as well as formal requests for information to the Israeli government that slow down the process.

Blaha also explained that “information that for any other country would without question result in ineligibility is insufficient for Israeli security force units”.

As a result, in the four years since the ILVF held its first meeting, the process “has failed to approve the identification of a single ineligible Israeli unit”, Blaha noted.

Ahmed Moor, a Palestinian American plaintiff in the case, said he got involved in the proceedings over fears for his loved ones in the Gaza Strip.

“My surviving family members in Gaza have been forcibly displaced four times, … living in constant fear of indiscriminate Israeli attacks carried out with American weapons,” Moor said in a statement.

“The US government’s military assistance to these abusive Israeli forces, which our own laws prohibit, is enabling these Israeli harms to me and my family.”

Ultimately, the lawsuit is asking a US federal court judge to declare the State Department’s actions as well as its ILVF procedures “arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion” and not in accordance with the law.

It is also asking the judge to order the US government to send Israel a list of military units that are not eligible to receive American assistance and issue an injunction prohibiting Washington from providing aid to units that have committed rights violations.

While other legal attempts to end US support for Israel have been blocked by the courts on the grounds that the judicial branch has no say over foreign policy decisions, Jarrar noted that the case is asking for an administrative law to be applied.

Tuesday’s lawsuit was filed under what’s known as the Administrative Procedure Act. “This is not an issue of foreign policy. It’s not an issue of politics,” Jarrar said.

“We’re just asking the judge to instruct the State Department to obey the law.”

Iran issues stern warning against E3 on snapback mechanism use

Amir Saeed Iravani

During a UN Security Council meeting on Resolution 2231, Iran’s UN representative, Amir Saeid Iravani, emphasized that invoking snapback is provocative and will be countered decisively by Iran.

He expressed Iran’s commitment to meaningful engagement, provided other parties demonstrate genuine political will and adhere to international law.

The Iranian envoy highlighted the root cause of the current JCPOA impasse as the unilateral withdrawal of the US and the failure of the European trio, namely France, Germany, the UK, to uphold their commitments under the deal.

“Iran has consistently acted in good faith, even after the US withdrawal and the E3’s persistent violations,” he asserted.

Iravani dismissed ‘baseless’ accusations against Iran’s nuclear program, asserting its ‘peaceful’ nature under strict supervision of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

He criticized attempts to link Iran’s JCPOA commitments with unrelated geopolitical issues and urged permanent member states of the UN Security Council
to address genuine regional threats, specifically Israel’s illegal nuclear arsenal and aggressive actions.

The Iranian diplomat reiterated Iran’s dedication to diplomacy and dialogue as the only viable path forward, urging the E3 and the US to abandon confrontational approaches and commit to genuine diplomatic efforts.

Saudi Arabia, Israel closing to normalisation agreement amid regional tensions: Haaretz

Netanyahu MbS

Sources familiar with the negotiations told Haaretz that rather than Israel agreeing to Saudi Arabia’s demand for the recognition of a Palestinian state, the two sides agreed that Israel would give a vague commitment on a “path towards Palestinian statehood”.

However, Axios reporter Barak Ravid on X cited a Saudi official who denied the report, saying there had been such a breakthrough.

“The notion that the kingdom’s leadership has somehow modified its longstanding commitment to the establishment of an independent Palestinian state is equally baseless,” the Saudi official said.

“The kingdom of Saudi Arabia will continue to work towards ending the war in Gaza and helping the Palestinian people achieve their right to an independent state.”

In public, Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman has labelled Israel’s actions in Gaza as a genocide, and said that there would be no Saudi normalisation with Israel without the recognition of a Palestinian state with East Jerusalem as its capital.

However, sources close to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu told Haaretz that the crown prince has “no personal interest in formal recognition of a Palestinian state and only requires progress on the issue to secure domestic political and religious support for the deal”.

The Haaretz reporting echoes a report in The Atlantic magazine, which said Mohammed bin Salman told US Secretary of State Antony Blinken that he does not personally care about what he referred to as the “Palestinian issue”.

“Seventy percent of my population is younger than me,” he reportedly explained to Blinken.

“For most of them, they never really knew much about the Palestinian issue. And so they’re being introduced to it for the first time through this conflict. It’s a huge problem. Do I care personally about the Palestinian issue? I don’t, but my people do, so I need to make sure this is meaningful.”

For several years, the administration of US President Joe Biden has been trying to secure a normalisation agreement between Saudi Arabia and Israel with no success, and with several weeks left until President-elect Donald Trump comes into office, Biden has little time to seal what would be a landmark diplomatic deal.

The report from Haaretz comes as indirect talks between Hamas and Israel are inching closer to a deal for a ceasefire in Gaza.

A Palestinian source told Middle East Eye on Monday that a “new dynamic” had emerged in the talks and denied reports in US and Israeli media that Hamas had conceded on its red lines, which include a permanent ceasefire, a full withdrawal of Israeli troops and the return of all displaced people to their homes.

On Tuesday, sources told Reuters that a deal was “expected to be signed in coming days”.

Hamas announced in a brief statement that there were “serious and positive discussions taking place in Doha” on Tuesday and that a deal was “possible” if Israel stopped introducing new conditions.

Mass grave found near Damascus could contain thousands of bodies

Mass Grave Syria

The site at al-Qutayfah, located 40km (25 miles) north of the capital, was one of several mass graves identified across the country after the collapse of the decades-long rule of the al-Assad family.

Twelve mass graves were also discovered in southern Syria. At one site, 22 bodies, including those of women and children, exhibited signs of execution and torture.

Al-Assad and his father Hafez, who preceded him as president and died in 2000, are accused of killing hundreds of thousands through extrajudicial killings, including in the country’s notorious prison system.

Ugur Umit Ungor, professor of genocide studies at the University of Amsterdam, told Al Jazeera that the discovery of the “centralised mass grave” in al-Qutayfah was “a reflection of the killing machine of the Assad regime”.

“The true scale of exactly how many mass graves are out there is only to be found in the archives of the Assad regime, that’s why it is absolutely crucial that they are handled in a professional way and that people don’t go pillaging them,” he added.

Ungor said creating a DNA depository of the families whose relatives are missing would help match the remains to a name, giving closure to those still looking for their loved ones.

The professor was among a handful of academics who received videos and other evidence from anonymous sources as part of a yearlong investigation into the burial sites.

Al Jazeera’s Mohammed Vall, reporting from Qatana, said the Syrian air force intelligence was believed to have been in charge of transferring the bodies from the hospitals – where they were collected from after having been killed in prison – and taking them to the mass graves.

“These mass graves hold the secrets of 54 years of despotism, torture and dictatorship,” Vall continued, adding, “This is only the beginning.”

Last week, Human Rights Watch visited the southern Damascus neighbourhood of Tadamon, where it found human remains that showed signs consistent with executions. The New York-based organisation called on the transitional Syrian authorities to preserve physical evidence across the country.

The commander-in-chief of the new administration, Ahmed al-Sharaa, told Al Jazeera that those who committed crimes against the Syrian people or who actively helped al-Assad commit those crimes would be brought to justice.

“We won’t give up on delivering the justice our people expect and we will not let the atrocities committed against our people be forgotten,” al-Sharaa, also known as Abu Mohammed al-Julani, said.

He added that “we’re gathering and collecting evidence” and called on the United Nations and other international institutions to help document the crimes committed by the regime.

On Monday, al-Assad put out his first statement since he was ousted, saying he fled Syria for Russia only after Damascus had fallen, and he denounced the country’s new leaders as “terrorists”.

Al-Sharaa’s Hayat Tahrir al-Sham (HTS) is listed as a “terrorist” group by many governments. It has sought to assuage fears, assuring protection for minorities, security and a peaceful political transition.

Analyst: NPT withdrawal would turn Iran into North Korea

Iran nuclear programe

Talking to Etemadonline news outlet, Makki highlighted the possible trajectory of Trump’s second administration, predicting a continuation of the “carrot and stick” policy: offering negotiations while keeping the military option as leverage.

He urged Iran to take regional threats seriously, particularly Israel’s growing confidence following advances in Syria and pressures on Gaza and Lebanon.

Discussing the internal and regional changes since 2015, Makki emphasized the importance of restoring economic stability and achieving national unity to counter external pressures.

He argued that diplomacy remains the best option to shield Iran from war, suggesting that while negotiations might not yield immediate results, they would help mitigate long-term risks.

On U.S. pressure, Makki acknowledged Washington’s intent to extract maximum concessions from Iran, fueled by Tehran’s need to lift sanctions.

The analyst also dismissed a full-scale military option, citing its immense costs and risks for all parties involved. However, he urged Iran not to disregard the threat entirely, given evolving geopolitical realities.