Friday, January 2, 2026
Home Blog Page 4951

Iran launches world’s largest floating oil terminal in Persian Gulf

Oil-Iran

Iran has launched the world’s largest floating oil export terminal in the Persian Gulf.

The 2.2-million-barrel floating oil storage unit (FSU), dubbed the Persian Gulf, came on stream in Soroush oil region on Sunday.

The FCU can take in some 200,000 barrels of heavy crude oil produced in Iran’s offshore oil fields of Soroush and Nowruz per day.

The floating terminal has a length of 337 meters, a width of 60 meters and a height of 33 meters.

The launch of the FSU will significantly increase Iran’s capacity for crude oil storage and exports.

Iran’s total in-place oil reserves have been estimated at more than 560 billion barrels, with about 140 billion barrels of recoverable oil. Heavy and extra-heavy varieties of crude oil account for roughly 70-100 billion barrels of the total reserves.

 

Iran ready to export technical services to Egypt: Deputy minister

Mohammad Khazaei
Mohammad Khazaei

Deputy Minister of Economy and Financial Affairs and head of Iranian Technical and Economic Investments and Services Center Mohammad Khazaei said on Saturday Iran is ready to export technical and engineering services to Egypt.

Mohammad Khazaei told a conference titled “Iran and Egypt: Future Prospect”, co-sponsored by the Iranian Foreign Ministry and the Egyptian Al-Ahram Institute in Tehran, that despite the imposed sanctions, Iran’s economic capacities are very high.

“That is the reason why Iran has exported technical and engineering services to various countries and Iranian engineers are currently busy constructing dams and other infrastructure facilities around the globe,” he said.

Khazaei said that Egypt can earn $2 billion to $3 billion each year through visits by Iranian tourists.

The official described Iran’s health tourism capabilities as a field for bilateral cooperation.

He expressed hope that Tehran-Cairo relations would reach a level that the two countries will focus on the establishment of a joint economic commission.

Iran’s former ambassador to the UN said that the Iran-Egypt disputes have never been deep-rooted and regardless of changes of governments in both countries Tehran and Cairo have a common stand on various regional and international issues.

He said that he had been a colleague of three Egyptian permanent UN envoys, adding: “I do not remember a single instance of Iran and Egypt having different views on any human rights or disarmament resolution put to vote at the UN.

A sand cat is set free from trap in northeastern Iran

Iran-sand cat

The environment police in Khvaf [a town in Khorasan Razavi Province] have acted swiftly on a report that a sand cat has been caught in a trap to capture houbara bustards alive in Sirkhoun Protected Area and rushed there to set the entrapped cat free.

According to the website of Iran Environment and Wildlife Watch (www.iew.ir), after medical examinations which gave the sand cat a clean bill of health, the feline was released in the wild within a day. After the rescue operation, the environment police destroyed all the traps set by poachers in the region. The following is a photo gallery which features the rescue of the sand cat caught in the trap:

 

A look at Iranian newspaper front pages on Feb. 8

Iranian Newspapers Headlines
Iranian Newspapers Headlines

Talks in Munich, Germany between Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif and top diplomats from P5+1 and other world figures dominated the front pages of Iranian newspapers on Sunday.

 

Afarinesh: The new chairman of the Assembly of Experts will be named March 10.

 

Afarinesh newspaper 2 - 8 - 2015


Aftab-e Yazd: Jannati Junior, the new target of hardliners

The minister of culture and Islamic guidance has said opponents of President Rouhani’s government have set up a nerve center to steer their anti-government measures.

 

Aftabe yazd newspaper 2 - 8 - 2015


Arman-e Emrooz: “The true Islam does not warrant violence,” said Seyyed Hassan Khomeini.

Arman-e Emrooz: A first phase of revelations by the culture minister

Ali Jannati has said those who were defeated in the elections are now throwing a wrench in the works.

 

Armane emruz newspaper 2 - 8 - 2015


Asrar: In Munich, Zarif and Kerry have agreed to meet again.

Asrar: “Some principlists are doubting republicanism in the name of Islam,” said a reformist former interior minister.

Asrar: “Some are constantly trying to ensure nuclear talks remain inconclusive,” said an aide to the president.

Asrar: “The rights of women are not fully observed in workplace,” said the labor minister.

 

Asrar newspaper 2 - 8 - 2015


Etemad: “Restore the authority of the science ministry,” appealed the science chief in a letter to the president.

Etemad: Jack Straw hailed the letter of the Supreme Leader to Western youth as amazing.

Etemad: The government owes Tehran Municipality $2.4 billion.

 

Etemad newspaper 2 - 8 - 2015


Ettela’at: “Child obesity rates are alarming,” said the Iranian health minister.

Ettela’at: Iran and P5+1 foreign ministers hold talks in Munich

“We won’t allow the other side to capitalize on the barrage of attacks aimed at Iranian nuclear negotiators at home,” said Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif.

Ettela’at: Iraqi Peshmerga fighters are positioned on the edge of Mosul

 

Ettelaat newspaper 2 - 8 - 2015


Ghanoon: A Revolution Guards commander has confirmed that Israel has sent Iran a message.

 

Ghanoon newspaper 2 - 8 - 2015


Iran: Hamid Rasaei [a parliament deputy] has been banned from holding public office.

 

Iran newspaper 2 - 8 - 2015


Kaenat: There have been 61 armed robberies in the capital so far this year [ends March 21, 2015]

 

Kaaenaat newspaper 2 - 8 - 2015


Kar va Kargar: Treatment of refractory diseases in public hospitals is now free of charge.

 

Karo kargar newspaper 2 - 8 - 2015


Kayhan: Zarif has denied reports that he told Secretary Kerry that failure of talks would endanger the future of President Rouhani.

 

 

Kayhan newspaper 2 - 8 - 2015


Kayhan International: [Iranian] Defense minister to visit Moscow

 

Kayhan international newspaper 2 - 8 - 2015


Khorasan: The first phase of Khorasan Grand Museum has opened.

 

Khorasan newspaper 2 - 8 - 2015


Sayeh: Some 600 lakes across Iran are on the verge of disappearance.

 

Sayeh newspaper 2 - 8 - 2015


Shahrvand: Central Bank has banned online trade in foreign exchanges.

 

Shahrvand newspaper 2 - 8 - 2015


Tejarat: Iran is not to press for compensations from Pakistan for its failure to keep its end of the bargain in a pipeline deal.

 

Tejarat newspaper 2 - 8 - 2015

 

Iranian Kamancheh player to perform with Estonian string orchestra

Iran-Music-Kamancheh

The Estonian string orchestra conducted by Sigrid Kuulmann will perform a few pieces with Iranian Kamancheh player Hamid Reza Afarideh at the international section of the 30th International Fajr Music Festival.

The festival brings together Iranian and foreign artists and troupes together each year. The following is the translation of a report on the annual music event by Mehr News Agency on February 7:

Over the past few years, the orchestra which brings together 11 musicians and is led by Kuulmann has performed in different countries, namely Switzerland, Austria, Italy, Finland, Germany, Belgium, Brazil, Chile, Argentine and Uruguay. It has also taken part in a music festival in Brussels, the International Piano Festival of Brescia and Bergamo and a music festival in Emilia-Romagna, Italy, the International Oleg Kagan Music Festival in Germany, a music festival in Saint Petersburg in Russia, along with festivals in Finland and Latvia.

Sigrid Kuulmann has been trained by prominent maestros. He has recently become a professor at the Estonian Academy of Music and Theatre.

The 30th Fajr International Music Festival has been scheduled for February 13-20, 2015. The Fajr festival which is Iran’s most prestigious music festival includes national and international competition sections.

The annual event is attended by domestic and foreign artists performing different pieces in various categories among them International and Folk Music, Classical Music and Youth and Women’s Music.

Who has the final say in the US?

Barack Obama in Congress

Trita Parsi, the president of the National Iranian American Council (NIAC), has described the decision of the US Congress to hold up new anti-Iran sanctions as a shift in Washington’s Iran policy.

On February 7, Ettela’at newspaper filed part of an opinion piece by Trita Parsi reported by The Japan Times (dated February 4). The following is the translation of what the Iranian daily wrote:

From the moment US President Barack Obama took office, the Iranian government had its doubts about his administration. There were two schools of “doubt.” The first questioned his intentions. They believed his rhetoric and promises were just that — empty words. In deeds, the argument read, he was no different from his war-prone predecessor. The other school doubted Obama’s abilities, not his intentions. Could an inexperienced, outsider president really shift America’s long-standing policy and attitude toward Iran? Was he even the real decision maker?

Parsi goes on to say, “Tehran’s doubts [about who the real decision maker is] were not unfounded. What used to be perhaps an academic question [in Iran], is today a very practical and pertinent one.”

Referring to the question of removal of US sanctions against Iran in the ongoing nuclear talks, he says, “By now, however, there should be less confusion in Tehran. The sanctions relief Obama is promising Iran in the nuclear talks are not his to lift. Obama has waiver rights, but only Congress can lift sanctions. Congressional opposition to a nuclear bargain with Iran has consequentially weakened Obama’s hand in the negotiations, […].

“It’s simple economics: Since the risk of dealing with a president that does not control the sanctions relief process is higher, the price Iran must ask for giving concessions must increase accordingly.”

Parsi then says, “[…] Some extraordinary changes to the political landscape in the US have occurred that should prompt Iran to reevaluate Obama’s abilities [about lifting of sanctions].”

[…]

Recalling redoubled efforts in the US Congress to pass fresh sanctions against Iran and the adverse effect of anti-Iran measures on the ongoing nuclear talks, he says, “Rather than seek a compromise with the Senate, he threatened a veto and warned it about the consequences of sabotaging the talks. […] But Obama stood firm. The threat worked. So far only two Democratic senators have co-sponsored the new sanctions bill.”

[…]

“Even more shocking, perhaps, was Hillary Clinton’s backing of Obama in this contest. In the midst of preparations for her presumed 2016 presidential run, Clinton came out against both AIPAC [the Zionists’ biggest lobby in the US] and Netanyahu.” and called the sanctions bill “a very serious strategic error.”

Parsi who leads a think tank, which is an ardent supporter of Washington-based Zionists, calls these developments a sign of Obama’s success in shifting Washington’s policy on Iran’s nuclear case and adds, “Any measure that undermines diplomacy, such as new sanctions, automatically enhances the risk of war.

“Passing sanctions on Iran used to be the safest political move in Congress. But today, imposing sanctions means supporting war, which is a move that carries a tremendous political cost. So high that Clinton chose to come out against AIPAC and Netanyahu instead.”

He also says, “This is not to suggest that Obama has taken control over the process of lifting sanctions. That authority remains in the hands of Congress. But what the recent wrangling in Congress shows is that Obama can redefine what is politically feasible and unfeasible.”

[…]

Zarif meets with British counterpart, Lebanese PM

Zarif-Hummon

Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif met separately with his British counterpart Philip Hammond and Lebanese Prime Minister Tammam Salam on the sidelines of the 51st Munich Security Conference in the south German city on Saturday.

Zarif and Hammond discussed the latest developments in the Iran nuclear negotiations process as well as the state of bilateral ties.

Iran’s top diplomat was also scheduled to meet with the Deputy Secretary General of the United Nations Jan Eliasson.

Later in the day, Zarif will hold talks with EU foreign policy chief Federica Mogherini and Iraqi Prime Minister Haider al-Abadi.

Meanwhile, Iran’s top nuclear negotiators Abbas Araghchi and Majid Takht-Ravanchi will also meet with their US counterparts Wendy Sherman and William Burns.

Nuclear talks failure will be a disaster: Straw

Straw

Former British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw said failure of nuclear negotiations with Iran will be a catastrophe.

In an exclusive interview with IRNA, he evaluated as positive the present conditions for signing a nuclear agreement between Iran and P5+1 and said the UK will welcome an agreement.

Stressing Iranˈs right for peaceful nuclear technology, he said the majority of political figures in the UK administration favored an agreement with Iran and are not sensitive about the terminology used in the documents.

He said it would be wise even to get to a solid though temporary agreement with Iran if a final one is impossible to achieve.

Straw who represents Blackburn in the parliament for the Labor Party further commented on the reopening of the British Embassy in Iran.

He referred to the issue of the consignments Britain is sending for its embassy in Tehran and the situation of a number of Iranian nationals in the UK who lack any legal permits as two topics which have to be settled by the two countries.

The British politician noted that many people in the UK are aware of the way Iranians feel towards the Great Britain because of its history in Iran.

He further termed the recent letter of the Iranian Supreme Leader addressed to Western youth as very timely and important.

As the member of Iran Friendship Group in the British Parliament, he said a parliamentary delegation is scheduled to visit Iran by mid-March 2015.

Iran’s FM: Violence has no place in Islam, unacceptable to Muslims

Zarif letter

Iranian Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif, in a letter to the UN secretary general, warned against the spread of Islamophobia after recent terrorist attacks in Paris, saying that such “senseless resorts to violence” has no place in Islam and its teachings.

“The fact that such senseless resorts to violence has no place in Islam and its exalted teachings, nor acceptable to Muslims, is not in doubt; notwithstanding the campaign by the perpetrators [and] promoters of Islamophobia [who] try [to] depict it (Islam) otherwise,” Zarif said in his January 29 letter to Ban Ki- moon.

In his letter, Zarif has also attached the recent message sent by the Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution to the youth in Europe and North America.

On January 21, Supreme Leader of the Islamic Revolution Ayatollah Seyyed Ali Khamenei wrote a letter asking the European and North American youth not to judge Islam based on the recent terrorist attacks in Paris.

The full text of the foreign minister’s letter is as follows:

 

29 January 2015

In the name of God, the Compassionate, the Merciful

H. E. Mr. Ban-Ki Moon

Secretary-General

United Nations

New York

I wish to draw your kind attention to the quite unsettling and pervasive manifestations of Islamophobia, which have further escalated in the aftermath of the recent terrorist acts in Paris. The unjustifiable killings by members of an infamous violent extremist group – whose raison d’etre and emergence recently as a player in our region is known to all – have been condemned by the Muslims across the globe, in clear and unequivocal terms, including governments, religious institutions and authorities, civil society and prominent individuals. The fact that such senseless resorts to violence has no place in Islam and its exalted teachings, nor acceptable to Muslims, is not in doubt; notwithstanding the campaign by the perpetrators [and] promoters of Islamophobia [who] try [to] depict it otherwise.

The issue for us, in the Islamic Republic, and in the larger Muslim world, is the prevalence of double-standards when it comes to the question of the proclaimed defense of the universally respected principle of the ‘freedom of expression’. You might find this of interest that in 2008, a cartoonist of the same magazine was instructed by the magazine’s editor to write a letter [of] apology for what was perceived to be anti-Semitic; and was summarily fired once he refused.

No such approach and resolve has ever been seen in the case of frequent frivolous caricatures defaming Muslim and desecrating Islamic values, which appeared in that magazine and other similar publications in Europe; leading to exacerbated tension with the Muslim community in France and the Islamic world. As we all have ruefully witnessed in recent times in various societies in the Western world, whether by political quarters and personalities, the media, or the virtual world, open assault on the religious values of Muslims, be it the person of Prophet Mohammad (PBUH), the Holy Qur’an or the Islamic teachings and values has regrettably become the order of the day.

This inherently dangerous phenomenon poses [a] serious threat to international peace and security, and the acutely needed ambiance of humane, peaceful inter-state and inter-people relations and the requisite recourse, by all, to dialogue, understanding and tolerance between and among the plurality of ethnic, religious and racial communities in our world today.

Beyond the immediate and necessary action to denounce and condemn acts of verbal or physical violence, the West and Europe in particular now needs to undertake a soul-searching exercise as to the underlying reasons why quite a sizeable number of individuals and groups espousing extremist ideologies and engaged in acts of brutal terror and heinous violence, in Europe and on a much bigger scale in Iraq and Syria, happen to be second generation Europeans.

This rather bizarre and seemingly inexplicable phenomenon cannot be a mere coincidence, nor can it be easily dismissed or pushed under the rug; it is part and parcel of the current European political landscape. It betrays signs of a deeper socio-political malaise in the societies concerned, and especially in the policies in place as regards Muslim minorities and their values and sanctities.

Recent analyses, prompted in large measure by the high rate of terrorist recruitments in Europe and North America, point in the direction of systematic failure of these societies, which has led to marginalization, alienation and disenfranchisement of these communities and their members, most notably the second generation, born, raised and educated in Western societies. It is bewildering, and equally frightening, that Da’esh terrorists, beheading innocent civilians and dangling with self-satisfying depravity the heads of the murdered hostages just happen to be speaking European languages with native accent. Pointing fingers of accusation towards others, whether Muslim countries, certain governments whose policies and politics might be found disagreeable, or much worse, Islam as a faith, even if politically-correct domestically and of instantaneous or short-term benefit, is simply unconvincing, and incapable of addressing serious problems at the societal, and now global, levels.

In writing this letter, Mr. Secretary-General, I do not intend to lament obvious manifestations of double-standards or find fault with highly-sanctioned policies by this or that Western government or society. Rather, I share this concern with you with a more serious objective in mind. Considering the institutional capabilities of the United Nations, and as a career multilateral diplomat who still believes in the substantial potentials of the Organization, I tend to remain hopeful that the UN and its capacity and mechanisms can be brought to bear on an issue of immense international impact and reverberations. Two Iranian proposals, adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on Dialogue Among Civilizations (A/Res/56/6) and World Against Violence and Extremism (WAVE) (A/Res/68/127) can provide appropriate institutional framework for this endeavor. More recently, in a message that I have the privilege to enclose, Ayatollah Khamenei has taken the lead in initiating dialogue with the youth in the West on this cardinal issue.

I strongly believe we urgently need to draw on our collective wisdom, at the level of the entire international community, to explore practical ways and means in this regard.

Looking forward to being advised of your resolute initiative, and underlining my readiness for further exchange of views on this topical issue, allow me, Mr. Secretary-General, to assure you of my highest consideration.

M. Javad Zarif

[…]

Transfer of power to 3rd generation is Saudi Arabia’s main challenge

Saudi King
Saudi King

Political circles in Iran expected Saudi Arabia to experience an unprecedented crisis after the passing of King Abdullah, but everything is apparently calm in the kingdom, although such stability might be short-lived.

Amir Mousavi, the head of the Center for Strategic Studies and an expert in Saudi affairs, has said in an interview with Khabaronline that the group which has assumed power in Riyadh is radical and the developments that unfolded following the death of King Abdullah have pushed the kingdom’s moderate groups to the sidelines.

The following is the translation of what Mousavi said in the interview on February 4 about the political prospects of Saudi Arabia after the death of King Abdullah:

Do you think Saudi policies vis-à-vis Iran will change after the death of King Abdullah?

To answer that question, the circumstances of King Abdullah’s death should be examined first. Was his death made public right after he passed away? Or did it happen well before the announcement? I think Abdullah had passed away several weeks earlier and the delay in the announcement of his death was simply meant to allow time for preparations for the post-Abdullah period.

Are you saying that Saudi officials intentionally held up the announcement of Abdullah’s death?

Yes, that’s right. If you take a look at Prince Mujtahid’s tweets, you see that he had made mention of this. He is living in Europe. He usually discloses Saudi secrets in his tweets.

Do you think those who were held up the announcement have achieved their goals and implemented the intended changes?

Prince Mutaib bin Abdullah was one of the individuals who tried to have a role in the new order, but he was denied any such role. He spent several weeks in the US and held consultations on new developments in the country, but apparently he failed in this regard.

I think those who have risen to power today have managed to cement their position and marginalize their opponents to some extent.

Let’s go back to the first question. Will Saudi policies toward Iran change?

The change, if it ever takes place, seems unlikely to be positive, because those who have seized power in Saudi Arabia today come from the ranks of the country’s radical groups. Unlike the group led by Abdullah which was somehow moderate, Salman and his inner circle belong to the country’s hardline political groups. That’s why we should not expect positive change in Saudi ties with Iran.

Will the power struggle come to a head in the current situation?

Perhaps, it’s too early to pass on judgment on that. We should wait and see where the political developments and rivalry which is unfolding and growing in the Al-Saud family will lead to.

Currently the Sudairi Seven have taken the upper hand in the kingdom’s political equation. Since the sons of Abdullah and those from other moderate groups have been isolated, whether or not Mutaib and like-minded princes can bring about change in defiance of Salman remains to be seen.

One key decision of Salman was the naming of a deputy crown prince. It was the first step in the transfer of power from the sons of Abdulaziz to the third generation [of princes]. Given that the king has picked his nominee from the Sudairi family, do you think other princes would respect his pick?

That is a good question. One of the most serious challenges Salman and the Saudi government are facing is the transfer of power to the third generation [of princes]. As you know, based on the will of Abdulaziz, the kings should be selected from among his descendants; as long as his sons are alive, delegation of authority to others is out of the question.

Salman has picked both his own successor and the deputy crown prince [second-in-line to the Saudi throne] who is the successor of his successor. This was an unusual trend King Abdullah set after two of his crown princes died before him.

Now Salman is following a similar trend, but the only difference here is that he has involved the third generation. Since Salman and Nayef are not in perfect health, the kingdom does not face a bright future.

We need to wait and see what will become of the infighting in the Al-Saud family after the death of King Salman and his Crown Prince Muqrin. That process seems unlikely to be calm and friendly.