Wednesday, December 24, 2025
Home Blog Page 55

Hamas refutes UN Gaza resolution, stresses international force would become party to conflict

Gaza War

“Assigning the international force with tasks and roles inside the Gaza Strip, including disarming the resistance, strips it of its neutrality, and turns it into a party to the conflict in favor of the occupation,” the group announced.

The UN Security Council on Monday voted to adopt a U.S.-drafted resolution endorsing Washington’s plan to end the war in Gaza and authorizing an international stabilization force for the Palestinian enclave.

Israel and the Palestinian group Hamas agreed last month to the first phase of Trump’s 20-point plan for Gaza – a ceasefire in their two-year war and a hostage-release accord – but the UN resolution is seen as vital to legitimizing a transitional governance body and reassuring countries that are considering sending troops to Gaza.

The text of the resolution says member states can take part in the Trump-chaired Board of Peace envisioned as a transitional authority that would oversee reconstruction and economic recovery of Gaza. It also authorizes the international stabilization force, which would ensure a process of demilitarizing Gaza, including by decommissioning weapons and destroying military infrastructure.

Hamas, in a statement, reiterated that it will not disarm and argued that its fight against Israel is legitimate resistance, potentially pitting the militant group against the international force authorized by the resolution.

“The resolution imposes an international guardianship mechanism on the Gaza Strip, which our people and their factions reject,” Hamas stressed in its statement, issued after the adoption of the resolution.

The Palestinian Authority issued a statement welcoming the resolution, and stressed it is ready to take part in its implementation.

The resolution’s text says that “conditions may finally be in place for a credible pathway to Palestinian self-determination and statehood” once the Palestinian Authority has carried out a reform program and Gaza’s redevelopment has advanced.

“The United States will establish a dialogue between Israel and the Palestinians to agree on a political horizon for peaceful and prosperous coexistence,” it adds.

Trump greenlights sale of F-35 warplanes to Saudi Arabia 

F35

Trump stated he will greenlight the sale of advanced F-35 fighter jets to Saudi Arabia, signalling a departure in how Washington handles sophisticated weapons transfers to Arab countries.

Trump made the announcement on Monday at the White House, just one day before Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman is due to visit. “We’ll be selling F-35s,” the president told reporters, lauding Washington’s ties with Riyadh.

“Yeah, I am planning on doing it. They want to buy them. They’ve been a great ally,” Trump said.

The decision marks a substantial win for Riyadh as Trump works to persuade Saudi Arabia to establish official ties with Israel as part of the Abraham Accords.

But Saudi officials have repeatedly reasserted the kingdom’s commitment to the Arab Peace Initiative, which conditions recognition of Israel on the establishment of a viable Palestinian state.

The potential arms deal between Washington and Riyadh raises questions about preserving Israel’s qualitative military edge, which is enshrined in US law. Some Israeli officials have already voiced opposition to the transfer of F-35 jets to Saudi Arabia.

The US has a decades-old commitment of ensuring Israel retains superior military capabilities over potential regional adversaries.

The principle, first established under President Lyndon Johnson in 1968 and formally adopted by President Ronald Reagan, has guided American arms sales in the Middle East for more than four decades.

Every US administration since has pledged to preserve Israel’s ability to emerge victorious against any likely combination of regional forces.

The F-35, manufactured by Lockheed Martin, is widely regarded as the world’s most advanced fighter jet, featuring technology that makes it difficult for enemy defences to detect.

Critics in Israel have warned the sale could erode the country’s longstanding military superiority in the region.

The timing of Trump’s announcement, just before Prince Mohammed’s visit to the White House, underscores the US administration’s efforts to deepen ties with Riyadh as part of its broader Middle East strategy.

Washington has historically managed concerns about Israel’s military edge by either downgrading weapons systems sold to Arab states or providing upgraded versions and additional equipment to Israel.

Prince Mohammed’s visit comes as the shaky ceasefire in Gaza continues amid near-daily Israeli violations.

On Monday, when asked about a potential F-35 deal with Riyadh, Trump invoked the US attack on Iran in June, which he said “obliterated” the country’s nuclear facilities.

Saudi Arabia was not involved in those strikes, but the kingdom’s official news agency, SPA, reported on Monday that Prince Mohammed received a handwritten letter from Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian before his trip to Washington – without providing details about its content.

If the F-35 sale materialises, Saudi Arabia would become the first Arab country in the F-35 programme.

In 2020, Trump approved the sale of F-35 jets to the United Arab Emirates after Abu Dhabi agreed to establish formal ties with Israel. But the deal fell through after Joe Biden succeeded Trump in 2021 amid concerns by US lawmakers over the security of the technology.

The US Congress can disapprove weapon sales authorised by the president and his secretary of state.

 

UN Security Council passes US resolution supporting international Gaza force

The resolution, drafted by the United States as part of President Donald Trump’s 20-point peace plan, passed in a 13-0 vote on Monday, paving the way for the crucial next steps for the fragile ceasefire between Israel and Hamas. Russia and China abstained from the vote.

Arab and other Muslim countries that expressed interest in providing troops for an international force had previously indicated that a UN mandate was essential for their participation. At their behest, the US had included more defined language about Palestinian self-determination in the draft to get it over the finish line.

The draft now says “conditions may finally be in place for a credible pathway to Palestinian self-determination and statehood” after the Palestinian Authority, which has limited self-governance in the occupied West Bank, carries out reforms and advances are made in the redevelopment of Gaza.

That language angered Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, who said on Sunday that Israel remained opposed to a Palestinian state and pledged to demilitarise Gaza “the easy way or the hard way”.

US Ambassador to the UN Mike Waltz stated after the vote that the “resolution represents another significant step that will enable Gaza to prosper in an environment that will allow Israel to live in security”.

The US resolution says the stabilisation troops will help secure border areas along with a trained and vetted Palestinian police force and they will coordinate with other countries to secure the flow of humanitarian aid into Gaza. It adds the force should closely consult and cooperate with neighbouring Egypt and Israel.

It also calls for the stabilisation force to ensure “the process of demilitarising the Gaza Strip” and “the permanent decommissioning of weapons from non-state armed groups”. The resolution authorises the force to “use all necessary measures to carry out its mandate”.

The resolution stresses Israeli forces would withdraw from Gaza “based on standards, milestones, and timeframes linked to demilitarisation”, which would be agreed by the stabilisation force, Israeli forces, the US and the guarantors of the ceasefire.

Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform that the international board of peace overseeing Gaza would “include the most powerful and respected Leaders throughout the World” and thanked countries that “strongly backed the effort, including Qatar, Egypt, United Arab Emirates, The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, Indonesia, Turkiye, and Jordan”.

Despite the ceasefire that came into effect on October 10, Israel has continued to carry out deadly attacks in Gaza almost daily and to restrict humanitarian aid.

Israel’s brutal assault has killed more than 69,000 Palestinians in what leading rights groups have described as a genocide.

 

Editor-in-chief: Didar News website reopens after 33-day block

He stated in an interview that following multiple follow-ups and discussions with the relevant authorities, the news portal was reopened after 33 days of being inaccessible.

Mohammadian underlined that the platform’s policy from its inception has been to serve as a pluralistic media outlet, reflecting the diverse thoughts and ideas within Iranian society.

He affirmed the commitment to continue this professional approach with even greater determination.

“The inherent duty of a media organization is to inform society and enlighten public opinion while remaining aligned with national interests”, Mohammadian said.

“We strongly believe that media credibility must remain within the country’s borders, and we will leave no effort undone to uphold this principle. This approach has guided Didar News throughout its years of operation and will continue to do so.”

EU says Ukraine needs 70bn Euros in 2026

The European Commission spelt out Kyiv’s needs in a paper circulated to member states as the 27-nation bloc debates whether to use frozen Russian assets to fund a new loan to plug Ukraine’s looming budget black holes.

“The scale of Ukraine’s financing gap is significant,” commission chief Ursula von der Leyen wrote in a letter accompanying the paper seen by AFP, before outlining financing options and urging states to “rapidly” choose a way forward.

Citing International Monetary Fund projections based on Russia’s war ending by the end of next year, Brussels said Kyiv’s assistance needs would reach over 70 billion euros in 2026 and 64 billion in 2027.

Ukraine can independently provide for only about half of its military needs for next year – worth a total of 103 billion euro — the paper said.

That leaves 52 billion euros in defence support and another 20 billion in macro-financial assistance — for a total of 72 billion euros — for allies to foot, the commission wrote.

The task of finding the money falls largely on the EU as, under President Donald Trump, the United States has cut off funding to Ukraine.

The commission has put forward a plan to use frozen Russian central bank assets to generate a 140-billion-euro “reparations loan” for Ukraine.

But that has faced opposition from Belgium — where the bulk of the money is held — which fears it could face legal reprisals from Moscow.

In the paper the EU executive listed two alternative options.

The first is for member states to underwrite grants to Ukraine and use wiggle room in the bloc’s central budget to back those, while the second is to jointly borrow the money.

“Clearly, there are no easy options. But this reflects both the scale of the challenge and the historic nature of the responsibilities before Europe at this critical juncture for Ukraine,” the paper read.

“Europe cannot afford paralysis, either by hesitation or by the search for perfect or simple solutions which do not exist.”

While the document did not state a preference, von der Leyen said last week that using frozen Russian assets was the “most effective way” to finance Ukraine.

EU officials and diplomats have also warned that the alternative plans would incur greater costs for countries at a time when national budgets are under strain.

The commission is pushing for an agreement to be reached when EU leaders meet in December.

In a bid to assuage Belgian reticence, von der Leyen held talks with the country’s Prime Minister Bart De Wever last week.

 

China pledges support for Syria in ‘achieving peace’

Shaibani’s trip to China comes amid growing efforts to rebuild Syria’s diplomatic presence after years of international isolation under Bashar al-Assad.

Syria’s new authorities are facing significant challenges, including reconstructing the country after the overthrow of longtime ruler Assad last December.

China supports Syria in “achieving peace at an early date”, coordinating security and development, and integrating into the international community, Wang told Shaibani on Monday, according to a readout from Beijing’s foreign ministry.

Beijing will also support Syria in finding “a nation-rebuilding plan that aligns with the will of the people” through political dialogue, Wang stated.

“China is willing to work together with the international community to contribute to Syria’s pursuit of security and stability,” he added.

Syria’s new leaders have sought to break from their violent past since taking power and present a more moderate image at home and abroad.

The Syrian war killed more than half a million people and devastated the country’s infrastructure.

Beijing has long provided Damascus with diplomatic support, particularly at the United Nations Security Council where China is a permanent member.

Assad met Chinese President Xi Jinping on the eve of the Asian Games opening ceremony in 2023, which Assad attended as part of his first visit to China since 2004.

During the talks, Xi announced a “strategic partnership” with Syria and hailed relations between the two countries that had “withstood the test of international changes”.

Almost 100 Palestinians have died in custody since October 2023: Israeli data

Physicians for Human Rights – Israel (PHRI) tracked deaths from causes including physical violence, medical neglect and malnutrition for a new report, using freedom of information requests, forensic reports and interviews with lawyers, activists, relatives and witnesses.

Israeli authorities only provided comprehensive data for the first eight months of the war. Over this period official figures show an unprecedented casualty rate among Palestinian detainees, on average one death every four days.

The military last updated data on deaths in detention for May 2024, and the Israel Prison Service (IPS) in September 2024. PHRI researchers identified another 35 deaths in detention after these dates and confirmed them with Israeli authorities.

Although the total number of deaths charted is significantly higher than other recent estimates, it likely fails to capture the full scale of Palestinian loss, said Naji Abbas, director of the prisoners and detainees department at PHRI.

“Even though we are providing evidence for a higher number of deaths than [previously reported] this is not a full picture,” he continued, adding, “We are sure that there are still people who died in detention that we don’t know about.”

Classified Israeli data indicates the majority of Palestinian prisoners from Gaza who died in jail were civilians, according to a parallel investigation by the Guardian, the Israeli-Palestinian publication +972 Magazine and the Hebrew-language outlet Local Call.

In May this year a military intelligence database tracking all Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad fighters in Gaza, a list of more than 47,000 named individuals, listed only 21 deaths in custody. By that point 65 Palestinians from Gaza had died in jail.

The figures for death in detention cover “security prisoners”, a category that includes civilians from Gaza held without charge or trial and prisoners of conscience from the occupied West Bank. Three of the dead were Palestinians with citizenship or residency in Israel.

Physical violence, torture and other abuse of Palestinians has been normalised across Israel’s jail system over two years of war, with the far-right national security minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, boasting about starvation rations and an underground jail holding Palestinians who never see daylight.

Current and former detainees and whistleblowers from the Israeli military have all alleged systemic violations of international law.

The institutionalised cruelty came with a disturbing rise in deaths recorded across at least 12 civilian and military facilities in Israel. In the decade before the war, there were on average two or three deaths a year.

“This isn’t just an individual case here and there. It is systemic and it will continue,” Abbas stated, in part because there is a culture of near total impunity for killing and mistreating Palestinians.

Just one case of assaulting detainees has come to trial, with the soldier sentenced to seven months. An attempt to prosecute others over a vicious assault including sexual violence led to right-wing protests and the arrest of Israel’s top military lawyer, with the suspects now demanding charges against them are dropped.

“Despite this mass number of deaths, over two years no one has been arrested,” Abbas said, adding, “There have been no charges over any killing.

“While these policies are being applied, every Palestinian in detention is in danger, even the healthy ones, even the young ones who have no [underlying] medical issues.”

Some deaths in detention have been high profile, including Adnan al-Bursh, 50, who was the head of orthopaedics at al-Shifa hospital, and died in Ofer prison after four months in detention.

A prisoner held with Bursh testified that he was brought to the yard by guards shortly before his death, visibly injured and naked from the waist down. His body has not been returned to Gaza.

Others prisoners who died in Israeli custody remain anonymous. The Prison Service and military provided PHRI with the number of deaths in detention, and minimal other details including the site where they died, but not the prisoners’ names.

In 21 cases, mostly individuals from Gaza, PHRI was not able to match the few details provided by authorities to a death recorded by rights organisations, either through testimony from released detainees or reporting in the media.

The detainees’ families may not know about their loved ones’ deaths either, as Israel has made it difficult to track Palestinians it is holding. For seven months at the start of the war the Israeli military refused to provide basic information about the status of thousands of people detained in Gaza, in effect implementing a policy of forced disappearance, PHRI said.

From May 2024 it has provided an email address for enquires about Palestinians from Gaza, but this has provided only a partial and limited improvement. PHRI noted “continued failures and lack of transparency”.

Lawyers are repeatedly told there is no record of their client’s arrest, even when it has been well documented. Over six months last year, Israeli authorities gave this response to inquiries about the status of about 400 individuals, rights group HaMoked reported.

Among the most high-profile prisoners is Hussam Abu Safiya, director of Gaza’s Kamal Adwan hospital, who was detained during a raid in December 2024. For a week the Israeli military denied holding him, despite video footage showing Israeli soldiers leading him into a vehicle.

The intense media scrutiny that ultimately led to acknowledging his detention is rare, and Israel’s refusal to provide clear, timely information about the status of prisoners “provides substantial grounds to fear that many are no longer alive”, the PHRI report added.

“These grave violations of international law have rendered any effort to determine the full scope of Israel’s policy of killing detained Palestinians, or to trace the fate of the many Palestinians taken into custody, extremely difficult, if not impossible.”

The Alfaqawi family had to petition Israel’s high court to find out that Mounir Alfaqawi, 41, and his son Yassin, 18, had died in detention. Israeli forces arrived at their home in Khan Younis in March 2024, interrogated both men in front of their relatives then took them away.

When HaMoked tried to trace them on behalf of the family, the military repeatedly claimed it had no record of detaining either man. A legal appeal in October won an admission that the men were “no longer alive”, and a claim military police were investigating their deaths.

Another former detainee testified he was forced to serve as a human shield for Israeli soldiers with the father and son. There are likely to be other families who should be mourning but are still hoping their loved one will return from Israeli jails.

Under the ceasefire agreed in mid-October, Israel released 250 Palestinian prisoners who had been convicted in Israeli courts, and 1,700 Palestinian detainees from Gaza who had been held indefinitely without charge or trial.

However, the scale of detentions has been so vast that even after that mass release, at least 1,000 others are still held by Israel under the same conditions.

The Israeli military announced that it acts “in accordance with Israeli and international law”, and is aware of the deaths of detainees, including those with pre-existing medical conditions or injuries “as a result of the hostilities”.

“As per standard protocol, an investigation is conducted for each death of a detainee by the military police,” the military said in a statement.

The IPS reported it operates in accordance with the law, “examines” every death in custody and refers cases to the “competent authorities as required”.

“The claims described do not reflect the conduct or procedures of the Israel Prison Service, and we are not aware of the incidents as presented,” it added in a statement.

Iran, Russia call on IAEA to maintain technical focus before key board session

Iranian Foreign Minister Seyyed Abbas Araghchi held a telephone  conversation at noon on Monday with his Russian counterpart Sergey Lavrov. During their conversation, the two sides discussed and exchanged views on bilateral relations as well as regional and international developments.

The Iranian foreign minister spoke about Iran’s diplomatic initiatives and consultations with regional countries aimed at safeguarding peace and stability in the region, stressing the importance of strengthening this process with the participation of all relevant parties.

Araghchi also referred to the constructive and responsible approach of the Islamic Republic of Iran toward the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA).

He underlined the necessity for the agency to adhere to its technical mandate and to avoid politicized behavior or being influenced by political pressure and interference from the United States and certain European members.

Lavrov for his part welcomed the formation of a regional consultation and cooperation framework, saying Moscow is ready to continue close coordination with Tehran.

He further pointed to Russia’s efforts at the UN to uphold the principles of the UN Charter.

The two sides also underscored the peaceful nature of Iran’s nuclear program ahead of the upcoming Board of Governors meeting and agreed to coordinate their positions within this framework.

The IAEA Board of Governors meeting will be held from Wednesday to Friday (19–21 November) at the Agency’s headquarters in Vienna.

According to reports, the three European countries—Britain, France, and Germany—along with the United States, have submitted a draft resolution concerning Iran’s nuclear program ahead of the session.

Kazem Gharibabadi, Iran’s Deputy Foreign Minister for Legal and International Affairs, had earlier warned that if an anti-Iran resolution is adopted in Vienna, Iran will undertake a fundamental review of its approach toward cooperation with the Agency as well as its commitments under the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).

Palestinians say US proposal for multinational force in Gaza aims to impose external control

Gaza War

In a joint statement, the factions said the proposed mandate would pave the way for “external domination over the Palestinian national decision,” shifting Gaza’s administration and reconstruction to a supranational body with wide authority – a move they argue would strip Palestinians of their right to govern their own affairs.

The groups stressed that any humanitarian effort must be managed through “competent Palestinian institutions” under UN oversight, based on respect for Palestinian sovereignty and the needs of the population, and free from attempts to use aid as a political or security tool to reshape Gaza’s internal reality.

They warned that channeling humanitarian assistance through a foreign-run mechanism would turn aid into a tool of pressure, undermining Palestinian institutions and weakening the UN agency for Palestinian refugees (UNRWA), whose role they stated “must be protected as an international witness to the refugee issue and their inalienable rights.”

The factions rejected any clause involving disarmament in Gaza or any infringement on the Palestinian people’s internationally recognized right to resist the Israeli occupation.

According to the statement, any discussion related to weapons must remain “a purely national matter” tied to a political process leading to an end to the Israeli occupation and the establishment of a Palestinian state.

The statement criticized the envisioned role of a proposed multinational force, warning that it would “practically serve the (Israeli) occupation” through direct coordination with Tel Aviv.

The groups added any international mission, if established, must fall fully under UN authority, coordinate exclusively with official Palestinian institutions, and limit its tasks to protecting civilians, ensuring aid delivery, and separating forces – without becoming a security authority or supranational administration.

They also refuted any form of foreign military presence, trusteeship, or international bases inside Gaza, calling such measures a direct assault on Palestinian sovereignty.

They called for international mechanisms to hold Israel accountable for its ongoing violations, including responsibility for civilian safety and the worsening humanitarian crisis resulting from Israel’s control of Gaza’s crossings.

The statement concluded that an Arab–Islamic framework for administering Gaza is the most acceptable model, and that any future arrangements must be rooted in “the free Palestinian will” and the unity of land, people, and cause.

The Arab–Islamic framework envisions that Hamas would hand over the administration of Gaza to a transitional Palestinian administrative committee of independent technocrats.

The statement comes as the UN Security Council is scheduled to vote Monday on implementing the second phase of US President Donald Trump’s Gaza plan, which includes deploying an international force in the enclave and outlining a pathway toward establishing a Palestinian state.

The Gaza ceasefire agreement entered into force on Oct. 10 under Egyptian-Qatari-US-Turkish mediation, though Israel has continued violations and blocked the move to the second phase of the deal, which centers on security and administrative arrangements in the strip and Israeli withdrawals.

 

Iran neither opposes negotiations nor intends to abandon uranium enrichment: Ex-FM

Kharazi made the remarks on Sunday afternoon at a daylong conference titled “International Law Under Assault: Aggression and Defense.” The event, held in Tehran by the Foreign Ministry’s Institute for Political and International Studies (IPIS), brought together diplomats and analysts from Iran and several other countries, including France, Italy, Greece, Britain, Russia, Iraq, and Lebanon.

“We do not escape from negotiations; what we reject is any negotiation conducted under pressure, at gunpoint, or through acts of violence,” he said, advising US President Donald Trump to adopt a constructive approach and demonstrate readiness for talks based on equality and mutual respect.

“At the same time, you should understand that we will not abandon the peaceful use of enrichment, we will not forfeit our defensive power, and we will not sell off our independence,” Kharazi added.

He noted that Iran is a resilient nation—one that has demonstrated its resilience on numerous occasions, including during the 12-day war of aggression launched by Israel on June 13, which the United States later joined.

The Donald Trump administration must accept the reality that Iran does not bow to pressure, he emphasized.

Tehran and Washington were engaged in negotiations over Iran’s nuclear program when Israel launched the war three days before a new round of talks. The regime targeted Iran’s nuclear facilities and critical infrastructure, assassinated scientists and senior military commanders, and killed more than 1,000 civilians. Iran responded forcefully with drone and ballistic missile strikes inside Israel.