Wednesday, December 24, 2025
Home Blog Page 2279

‘Iran seeks removal of US sanctions during Vienna talks’

“The main purpose of these talks from the Islamic Republic of Iran’s standpoint is to remove the illegal sanctions imposed on the Iranian nation by the US government in blatant violation of the JCPOA (the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action) and the UN Security Council Resolution 2231,” Ali Baqeri said in an exclusive interview with Press TV in London.

Baqeri added the talks will not be about the nuclear issue, which has already been resolved, but will rather focus on the US withdrawal from the 2015 multilateral deal and the termination of its illegal sanctions against the Islamic Republic.

“What Americans did by leaving the nuclear deal was not only in violation of the JCPOA, but also the UN Security Council Resolution 2231. The objective of the negotiations is to remove US sanctions, both slapped in the past and in the wake of their withdrawal from the nuclear deal,” he noted.

The senior Iranian diplomat explained that the remedial measures that Tehran took in response to the US withdrawal from JCPOA are within the legal rights stipulated in Article 26 of the nuclear deal, which grants a party the right to suspend its contractual commitments in case of non-compliance by other signatories and let go of some of the restrictions imposed on its nuclear energy program.

He said Iran is seeking practical guarantees that the international deal would not be violated by the United States anymore.

“Not only did they (Americans) hurt Iranians by withdrawing from the nuclear deal, violating the UN Security Council Resolution 2231 and imposing sanctions on Iranians, but they also harmed the parties to the deal as they had business transactions and contracts with Iran,” Baqeri added.

He also lauded his recent conversations with officials from France, Germany and the United Kingdom, saying they were straightforward and serious.

“Those conversations were clear and progressive. I shared our perspective on the necessary framework for the upcoming talks in an unequivocal and very transparent manner. I also shared with them what our expectations of the upcoming negotiations are,” the Iran’s top negotiator pointed out.

“What is important for these European countries is to pursue their own interests rather than those of anyone else,” Baqeri continued.

The Iranian diplomat also hailed his talks with officials from the UK Foreign Office as positive, stating that the two sides had comprehensive discussions on bilateral relations, regional issues and future sanctions-removal talks.

Envoys from Iran and the P4+1 group of countries — Britain, France, Russia, and China plus Germany — are expected to hold the seventh round of discussions in the Austrian capital on November 29.

Former US President Donald Trump left the JCPOA in May 2018 and reimposed the anti-Iran sanctions that the deal had lifted. He also placed additional sanctions on Iran under other pretexts not related to the nuclear case as part of his “maximum pressure” campaign.

Following a year of strategic patience, Iran resorted to its legal rights under the JCPOA, which grants a party the right to suspend its contractual commitments in case of non-compliance by other signatories, and let go of some of the restrictions imposed on its nuclear energy program.

The US administration of Joe Biden has announced it is willing to compensate for Trump’s mistake and rejoin the deal, but it has shown an overriding propensity for maintaining the sanctions as a tool of pressure.

Tehran insists that all sanctions must first be removed in a verifiable manner before the Islamic Republic reverses its remedial measures.

Separately in another interview with Bloomberg, Baqeri said European signatories to the 2015 Iran nuclear deal have a critical role to play once talks resume in the Austrian capital.

They could provide powerful tools to bolster the agreement, he stated, especially employing blocking statutes to protect European companies doing business with Tehran from any future American sanctions.

“The use of their capabilities and means, including blocking statutes,” could definitely help, the deputy Iranian foreign minister continued, adding, “We want all the sanctions that are contrary to the nuclear deal to be lifted, whether that’s from the [Barack] Obama or Trump era.”

Asked if the nuclear talks will pick up from where they were stalled months ago, he noted, “The important point is that we reach an agreement that leads to a practical result.”

That might involve blending achievements from the previous rounds of talks and “part of it might be about matters outside of that,” Baqeri stated.

He highlighted that Iran had “good and constructive cooperation with the IAEA (International Atomic Energy Agency),” and he saw no reason for “any negative interaction with the agency.”

The top Iranian diplomat also said that a 400 million pound ($535 million) debt owed by the UK to Tehran over a decades-old military contract will hopefully be settled “soon,” and that the two countries are trying to work out how the payment can be made.

Baqer added the matter had been discussed in his meeting with British Foreign Ministry officials on Thursday.

“The main issue about paying the debt and its level is agreed, but the method and process of how the payment is made hasn’t yet been resolved,” he said, adding that the discussions will continue in Tehran next week.

The International Military Services (IMS), a subsidiary of the British Ministry of Defense, signed contracts in 1971 to sell more than 1,750 Chieftain tanks and armored vehicles to Iran. The deals were canceled after the Pahlavi regime was deposed in the 1979 Islamic Revolution, but Iran had already paid for the undelivered tanks and demanded its money back.

An international arbitration in 2008 ruled that the UK owed the debt, but it has not been paid off yet.

Iranian officials have denied any link between the case and the issue of Nazanin Zaghari, an Iranian who was arrested for spying in 2016.

Zaghari has been sentenced to prison in Iran for involvement in anti-government activities.

Afghanistan mosque hit by yet another blast; several killed and injured

At least three people were killed and 15 wounded Friday by a blast at a mosque in Afghanistan’s Nangarhar province, a hospital official told AFP.

The blast happened in Spin Ghar district of the eastern province, a hotbed of Islamic State group activity since the Taliban seized power in the country in August.

“I can confirm a blast during Friday prayers inside a mosque in Spin Ghar district. There are casualties and fatalities,” a Taliban official told AFP.

“So far three killed, 15 wounded,” a doctor at the local hospital told AFP.

The Afghan branch of the Islamic State group, which first emerged in Nangarhar in 2015, has claimed responsibility for a series of bloody attacks in Afghanistan since the Taliban’s return to power.

One of the latest, in early November, saw IS fighters raid the Kabul National Military Hospital, killing at least 20 people and injuring more than 50.

More than 120 people were killed in IS attacks earlier this year on two mosques popular with the ethnic minority Hazara community.

Ex-diplomat: India hurt “own interests” through compliance with US

Talmiz Ahmad, a former Indian ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Oman, and the United Arab Emirates (UAE), has spoken to Sputnik about New Delhi’s evolving policy towards Iran under Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

How would you characterise India’s relations with Iran under Prime Minister Narendra Modi? Are India’s ties with Iran dependent on its relations with the United States?

Ahmad: India’s relations with Iran have always been subjected to the vagaries of its ties with the United States. However, what has alarmed me in the recent period is India’s complete acceptance of what ex-President Donald Trump initiated in 2018.

While India has been involved in developing a substantial security relationship with the United States, it was entirely possible for Indian policy-makers to convey to Washington that New Delhi has its own interests in maintaining stable ties with Tehran.

Not only does India share the same neighbourhood with Iran and both have civilisational ties dating back a few thousand years, but there are geopolitical, economic, and security interests to be taken care of.

India is becoming part of America’s own agenda on Iran. Of late, the impression that New Delhi has sent out is that it has subordinated its interests to the US, even though everything that the US did has been illegal under international law. Iran hadn’t done anything illegal under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA).

While India did manage to get an exemption from the JCPOA-related American sanctions as far as its involvement in the port of Chabahar was concerned, the aggressiveness with which Washington promoted its sanctions scared away Indian companies from investing in Chabahar and complementing the government’s role in further developing the port and allied infrastructure around it.

India has always signalled to the Americans that it would remain subservient to its interests. But the Americans haven’t displayed the same reciprocity when it comes to our own regional and immediate interests.

Do you believe that the Joe Biden administration has been adopting a more moderate policy towards Iran than its predecessor? And has the change of administration in Washington benefited India-Iran ties?

Ahmad: Frankly, there hasn’t been much of a change in real terms. While Joe Biden did signal initially that getting the Americans back into the JCPOA would be a priority, the fact also remains that six rounds of negotiations have taken place and the US is still to get back into the agreement.

With regard to India, I would note that New Delhi almost doubled its annual budget allocation for the Chabahar port at the start of this year [after Biden took office]. However, I would wait until next year to see how much of the allocated budget has indeed been utilised, given that the sanctions still remain intact.

I would also like to point out here that, of late, there have been attempts by the Modi government to reengage with Iran after President Ebrahim Raisi’s election victory, despite Tehran being excluded from New Delhi’s strategic framework.

While India has opened a dialogue with the new government in Tehran, so far, I haven’t seen any evidence of anything concrete offered by India which would change the overall texture of bilateral relations.

How crucial is having warm and friendly ties with Iran for India’s geostrategic interests?

Ahmad: Iran has a very large geopolitical presence in the neighbourhood. It has a very long coastline. Then, its overall strategic value for India is only enhanced by the fact that it shares a border with both Pakistan and Afghanistan, as well as with Central Asian [countries]. It is effectively a role-player in West Asia, Central Asia as well as South Asia.

Of course, it is also a major energy provider and has traditionally ranked as the largest crude supplier for New Delhi. Its geography also makes it a crucial regional connectivity hub.

How do you see India’s role in the four-nation grouping including Israel, the United Arab Emirates, and the US that was unveiled last month?

Ahmad: The grouping, or Quad 2.0 as it has been referred to, makes no sense to me. You have to look at the timing before looking at the context. And I don’t think the new group will be of any strategic value for West Asia or India.

Very frankly, for India, being a member of the new group is just a publicity stunt from a government that has very little to show in terms of its foreign policy achievements. I think the new group will wither away into irrelevance with time.

I sense a strong US hand in pursuing the four nations, especially India, to come together for this grouping, just like it brokered the Abraham Accords last year.

So, has developing closer ties with the US backfired for India in its own neighbourhood?

Ahmad: For the last 15 years, India has been steadily upgrading its strategic and defence ties with the United States. To me, that is not a well-thought-out policy. It is a knee-jerk reaction of sorts to a certain challenge, which is the rise of China.

However, the pro-US policy that India has pursued in response to the challenge hasn’t benefited Indian interests as much as it should.

On the contrary, I would argue that this clear pro-US tilt may have contributed to the deterioration of relations with China and possibly led to the ongoing Ladakh standoff.

The security relationship that we have been building with the US has served American strategic interests quite well. The Quadrilateral Security Framework, or the Quad, has pulled India into the South China Sea and shown India to be an active participant in a grouping perceived to be hostile against China.

However, what about India’s 4,000-kilometre-long undemarcated border with China? Has the situation in Ladakh changed to India’s advantage since the Quad leaders’ virtual and in-person summits, both of which happened this year?

Ahmad: Russia and China are now closely collaborating, and a triumvirate of sorts has emerged at our border, involving both of them as well as Iran.

Pakistan and Afghanistan are in close coordination with these three countries and India has been left excluded in its own neighbourhood.

India has been more focused on the overall maritime scenario, while it has neglected its priorities, which remain its land borders.

Iran Covid deaths the lowest in months

The deaths push to 127,918 the total fatalities since the pandemic started. The downward trend in Covid deaths, infections and hospitalizations has held in Iran in the past weeks. Authorities say most of those killed by Covid are unvaccinated people.

Meanwhile the number of cities marked red, the highest level of risk from Covid, has decreased.

Currently, 22 cities are red, while 87 and 222 others are respectively orange and yellow. 113 cities are blue, which means the situation is normal there.

The Health Ministry has also announced 97,560,246 doses of Covid vaccine has so far been administered to people in the country since the nationwide vaccination drive started several months ago.

According to the ministry, 55,511,128 people have received the first shot and 41,650,237 the second dose. Meanwhile, 398,881 people have been given a third dose known as the booster shot.

On Thursday, Iran’s First Vice President Mohamamd Mokhber warned citizens against ignoring health protocols, saying this could thwart all the efforts of the government and the healthcare staff across Iran in the fight against Covid. Mokhber also urged the media to give accurate information to citizens so that they will not ease health protocols.

Iran, Pakistan discuss sea, land border security

Iran’s Border Guard Command chief Brigadier General Ahmad Ali Goudarzi and Director General of Pakistan’s Maritime Security Agency Admiral Mohammad Shoaib have discussed via video conference the latest developments in bilateral cooperation at sea, border management and simultaneous patrolling.

Some other officials from Pakistani Foreign and Defense Ministries and also Iran’s military attaché in Pakistan Colonel Mostafa Ghanbarpour were also present in the virtual meeting.
Goudarzi and Shoaib agreed to expand cooperation in different areas.

Meanwhile, respective officers from Iran’s Border Guard Command and Pakistan’s Maritime Security Agency held detailed specialized discussions about bilateral agreements in various fields.

Iran and Pakistan have a 959-kilometer border and lots of mutual interests regarding security and trade.

Afghanistan says to import electricity from Iran

Spokesperson of the De Afghanistan Breshna Sherkat (DABS), Afghanistan’s electricity body, Hekmatullah Noorzai said that they have reached an agreement with Iran based on which Afghanistan will buy 100 megawatts of electricity.

Noorzai stated that the electricity will be distributed in the neighboring Herat, Nimroz, and Farah provinces in the west of Afghanistan.

“We will buy one hundred megawatts of electricity from Iran and distribute it in the western provinces in order to address the shortage of electricity in the provinces,” added Noorzai.
The decision comes as people in the central provinces of Afghanistan including the capital Kabul have been complaining about the dearth of electricity, especially in the winter season.

Officials in DABS have noted that Afghanistan needs 850 megawatts of electricity every year from which 620 is imported from the central Asian countries and rest of the power is supplied from local supplies.

Nasrallah: Saudis after civil war in Lebanon

The secretary general of Lebanon’s Hezbollah resistance movement has accused Saudi Arabia of seeking to provoke civil war in Lebanon, saying Riyadh pretends to be friends with the Lebanese people and government while pushing its allies to stand against the popular resistance movement in the country.

Nasrallah made the remarks in a televised speech on Thursday, while addressing a ceremony held to commemorate Hezbollah Martyrs’ Day, which annually falls on November 11.

“It is assumed that Saudi Arabia presents itself as a friend of the Lebanese people, but its problem is with Hezbollah. Is this how a friend deals with his friend?” Nasrallah stated.

He added, “The Saudi pressure [on the Lebanese information minister to resign over remarks made on the Yemen war] is part of the battle against the resistance in Lebanon and not with Hezbollah, as a political party, and is therefore [a battle] against the resistance.”

Tensions rose between Riyadh and Beirut following critical comments made by Lebanese Information Minister George Kordahi in an interview regarding the Saudi-led war against Yemen. During the interview, Kordahi called the Saudi-led Yemen war futile, and noted that Yemeni army forces and their allied fighters from Popular Committees are defending themselves.

Kordahi’s remarks infuriated Riyadh and prompted it to order Lebanon’s ambassador to leave the kingdom within 48 hours and ban all imports from the Mediterranean country.

“We know the Saudi role in the [33-day] war of July [2006] and the Saudi incitement to continue that war,” the Hezbollah chief said, adding, “Saudi Arabia wants its allies in Lebanon to fight a civil war with Hezbollah in the service of Israel and America.”

The Hezbollah chief underlined that Saudi Arabia “has not given Lebanon any help for years because it wants a civil war” in the country.

He also rejected calls for the resignation of the Lebanese information minister, saying that Kordahi’s comments were “calm and objective.”

The leader of Hezbollah resistance movement also added that Saudi Arabia has fabricated a crisis with Lebanon over comments made by the Lebanese information minister over the Saudi war on Yemen.

Nasrallah underscored Riyadh’s exaggerated reaction to Kordahi’s comments was an excuse to open a front against the resistance movement.

“Saudi Arabia’s reaction to Kordahi’s statements is very, very, very exaggerated,” he said, adding, “There are American officials and Arab diplomats who described the war on Yemen in harsher terms than Kordahi’s statement.”

Elsewhere in his remarks, Nasrallah pointed to the Saudi aggression on Yemen’s central province of Ma’rib, saying, “We have accepted the Saudi sanctions against us for years because of our position on the war on Yemen.”

The Hezbollah chief added that “Saudi Arabia’s main issue is with Yemen, specifically in Ma’rib, and the results of the war, which has failed completely.”

He noted that the row with Lebanon was Saudi Arabia’s response to gains by Yemeni forces against Saudi-backed forces in Ma’rib, but the pressure would not work and the city’s eventual fall would have “very big” consequences.

Addressing Saudi Arabia, Nasrallah stated, “If you want to stop the war, the only way to do that is to accept the ceasefire and lift the siege” on Yemen.

Saudi Arabia, backed by the US and regional allies, launched the war on Yemen in March 2015, with the goal of bringing the government of former president, Abd Rabbuh Mansur Hadi, back to power and crushing the popular Ansarullah movement, which had overthrown the previous Saudi-backed Yemeni government. The Saudi war has left hundreds of thousands of Yemenis dead, and displaced millions more. It has also destroyed Yemen’s infrastructure and spread famine and infectious diseases.

In the meantime, Yemeni armed forces and the Popular Committees have grown steadily in strength against the Saudi invaders and left Riyadh and its allies bogged down in the country.

In another part of his speech, Nasrallah pointed to recent steps taken by Arab countries to mend fences with Syria, saying, “During recent days and weeks there have been reports about contacts between heads of state from Arab countries with [Syrian President] Bashar al-Assad.”

“The foreign minister of the United Arab Emirates has also paid a visit to Syria… this means acceptance of Syria’s victory [in its war on terror] by Arab countries and their admission of the failure of a project on which they have spent billions of dollars,” the Hezbollah chief added.

During his televised speech on Thursday, Nasrallah denounced as “completely false” the Saudi claims that Lebanon is being controlled by Hezbollah.

“All the Lebanese realize that Saudi claims about Hezbollah’s hegemony over Lebanon are completely false,” the Hezbollah chief said, noting, “These Saudi allegations are absurd and the most ridiculous of them is the idea of the Iranian occupation of Lebanon.”

Nasrallah added, “We do not deny that we are an influential party and that we are the largest party at the political and structural levels, but we do not dominate. There are forces with much less strength than us, who have a great influence on the state, especially in the judiciary.”

He stated, “The argument of Saudi Arabia that we are a dominant party in Lebanon is a complete lie and complete slander.”

Nasrallah stressed Israel’s “anxiety” over the growing strength of Hezbollah and said, “The repeated Israeli maneuvers in the north of the occupied Palestine reflect the Israeli concern about Lebanon.”

“The Israeli maneuvers reflect the fear that Lebanon will storm the settlements in the Galilee,” he added, referring to an Israeli-occupied region near the Lebanese border and the Israeli-occupied side of Golan.

“The Israelis are aware of the resistance’s strength, sincerity, lofty status, and the importance of its strategic ideas,” he said, adding, “if the resistance enters northern Palestine and the Galilee, this will have very big repercussions on the occupation entity.”

The Hezbollah chief also noted, “The Israelis are obsessed with fear of the growing strength of the axis of resistance, especially after the battle of Saif al-Quds (Operation al-Quds Sword).”

Nasrallah stressed that “Israel is experiencing existential anxiety and is trying to breathe through the path of normalization [of relations with a number of Arab countries].”

He added that “all countries with which Israel has normalized relations will not be able to protect it and they know that.”

The Hezbollah leader said, “The increasing Israeli violence against the prisoners and the Palestinians is not a sign of strength, but rather a sign of anxiety and panic.”

Former Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu signed agreements with Emirati Foreign Minister Sheikh Abdullah bin Zayed Al Nahyan and Bahrain’s Foreign Minister Abdullatif Al Zayani during an official ceremony hosted by Trump at the White House on September 15 last year.

In January, Sudan’s ruling military junta officially signed the Abraham Accords to normalize ties with Israel.

Morocco’s monarchy and Israel agreed on December 10 last year to normalize relations in a deal brokered by the United States.

Palestinians, who seek an independent state in the occupied West Bank and Gaza Strip with East al-Quds as its capital, view the deals as a betrayal of their cause.

Top diplomat: Iran not to negotiate over defense, security

Iran requires a commitment that the US will not again leave the nuclear deal signed with world powers in 2015, Bagheri told The Guardian.

He said that talks in Vienna between Tehran and other signatories had failed to reach agreement on a means of verifying that US sanctions had both been lifted and had a practical impact on trade with Iran.

“We need verification, and this remains unresolved. It is one of the issues that remains not finalised. It is not enough for the ink to be put on the agreement,” he added.

Bagheri did not rule out an independent body being responsible for verification.

The Vienna talks are due to recommence at the end of the month after being suspended by Iran, after the June election of a new president, Ebrahim Raisi.

Bagheri is touring European capitals to set out the Iranian negotiating position.

Iran has announced it will not take its own steps back into full compliance with the deal until verification of US actions has been secured. Iran has been increasing its uranium stockpile and use of advanced centrifuges beyond the limits set in the deal. It has limited the access of the UN nuclear inspectorate.

Defending his demand that the US give a guarantee that it will comply with the agreement, Bagheri stated that “this is about an agreement not a policy. If there is a peace agreement between two states, it has the effect of a treaty. This is international law. It is not intended that domestic laws of the US can prevail over an international agreement. That is against international law”.

He noted he wanted European powers to give their own guarantees that they will trade with Iran, regardless of the US position, possibly by using a blocking statute nullifying the effect of US sanctions on European firms that trade with Iran.

Bagheri denied that Iran had been stalling on the talks’ resumption in an effort to develop its own nuclear program, saying it was natural for a new government to take time to prepare its negotiating position and to hold bilateral talks with the other parties.

The official repeated calls for all US sanctions linked to the nuclear deal to be lifted.

Iran views sanctions that the US says were imposed for Iranian acts of terrorism or human rights abuses as linked to the nuclear deal, and therefore requiring lifting.

He also ruled out discussions on Iran’s missile and security program being included in the agreement.

He stated, “The JCPOA (Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action) has a clear framework and other issues are not relevant. We are not going to negotiate on our defence capabilities or our security.”

He added, “Iran’s relations with other countries did not need a guardian.”

He denied his negotiating stance was so tough that it would be impossible to reach an agreement in Vienna.

“We are just saying that in accordance with the JCPOA the sanctions should be lifted. We did a deal, and our view is that it should be implemented,” he continued.

Asked if he was requiring the Vienna talks to go back to the start, he announced, “What is important is not from where we started, but what is important is that we achieve a deal that has practical results for the parties. Our main objective is to remove the illegal sanctions that they have imposed on the Iranian nation in breach of UN resolutions. Any sanctions in breach of the JCPOA imposed by President Obama and President Trump have to be lifted. That is the agreement set out the JCPOA.”

Report: Turkish FM to visit Iran, Lebanon within days

Al-Joumhouria daily said on Friday Cavusoglu will visit Iran next week. The Turkish Foreign Minister will arrive in Beirut next Tuesday after visiting Tehran.

However, there is no indication of who the Turkish top diplomat will meet in Iran and for what purpose he will enter Tehran.

The Lebanese newspaper also added Cavusoglu will hold meeting with many high-ranking Lebanese officials to reiterate Ankara’s support for the Lebanese government.

Iran’s deputy FM: Talks with British officials serious, positive

Bagheri added that the negotiations were a step forward in bringing the views of the officials of Iran and Britain closer together.

The deputy foreign minister said he held talks with British officials over bilateral ties, regional issues and the upcoming Vienna negotiations aimed at reviving the Iran nuclear deal.

Bagheri said he raised the issue of Britain’s 400 million pound debt with the UK officials but the two sides have yet to arrive at a conclusion regarding the debt that dates back to before the 1979 Islamic Revolution.

He noted that Britain has admitted that it owes the debt and that Tehran and London have differences over how it must be paid back.

Bagheri was also asked if he raised the British Foreign Office’s travel advisory on visits to Iran that urges British citizens to avoid all nonessential travel to the country as the move goes against the spirit of normalization of ties. Bagheri said he discussed a host of issues with the British side but Iran and Britain have a long way to go before normalization of ties.