US vetoes Palestinian push for full UN membership

Twelve countries voted in favour of the resolution, which was brought for a vote during an hours-long Security Council session in New York on Thursday, while two others – Britain and Switzerland – abstained.

After vetoing the measure, the US deputy envoy to the UN, Robert Wood, said Washington believes there is no other path to Palestinian statehood than through negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians.

“We also have long been clear that premature actions here in New York, even with the best intentions, will not achieve statehood for the Palestinian people,” Wood added.

The resolution was widely expected to fail, as the US – Israel’s staunchest ally – holds veto power at the Security Council and had opposed its passage.

The vote comes more than six months into Israel’s bombardment of the Gaza Strip, which has killed almost 34,000 Palestinians and plunged the coastal enclave into a humanitarian catastrophe.

The state of Palestine currently is a non-member observer at the UN. But an application to become a full UN member needs to be approved by the Security Council and then at least two-thirds of the General Assembly.

Before the vote on Thursday afternoon, Ziad Abu Amr, the UN special representative for the state of Palestine, had appealed for support.

“We are still longing to practice our right to self-determination, to live in freedom, security and peace in an independent state similar to other countries around the world,” Abu Amr told the council.

Palestinians, he added, “made and continue to make great sacrifices to achieve this goal”.

Abu Amr also dismissed claims that the resolution would imperil political negotiations and prospects for peace.

“To those who say that recognising the Palestinian state must happen through negotiations and not through a UN resolution, we say: ‘How was the State of Israel established? Wasn’t that through a UN resolution, which was Resolution 181?’” Abu Amr said.

“This resolution will not be an alternative to negotiations and to resolving pending issues. It will grant hope to Palestinians for an independent state after this hope dissipated,” he continued.

“We hope you will give us the opportunity to become an integral part of the international community that is working to achieve international peace and security.”

Israeli ambassador to the UN, Gilad Erdan, used his address to the Security Council to accuse the body of being politicised. He also described the resolution as a “prize to [the] terrorists” involved in the October 7 attack by the Palestinian group Hamas, which governs Gaza.

“If this resolution passes – God forbid – this should no longer be known as the Security Council but as the ‘terror’ council,” he said.

“The only thing that a forced unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state will do is to make any future negotiation almost impossible.”

In addition, Erdan called the Palestinian Authority (PA) a “genocide-loving entity that doesn’t deserve any status” in the UN, which requires new applicants to be “peace-loving” nations.

He further argued that the PA has no authority over Gaza and some parts of the West Bank.

“So who is the UN going to recognise? Who is going to be in charge?” he asked.

“The UN is not committed to multilateralism. Sadly, it is now committed to multi-terrorism,” he continued, adding, “Today the mask has finally fallen. The UNSC has exposed itself.”

Erdan slammed the UN for voting on a “destructive and immoral” resolution at a time when confrontations between Israel and Iran were at risk of escalating.