Civil War: Northern vs Southern White House

Mar-a-Lago-trump

The resignation of Trump’s former national security advisor, Michael Flynn, has laid bare a fierce clash between the centres of power and factions in the White House and the Republican Party.

The clashes within the US have turned to the main focus of international media and given rise to speculations over the possibility of Trump being removed from office.

These days, media reports reveal a growing competition between the centres of power and factions in the White House and the Republican Party in the aftermath of the resignation of Michael Thomas Flynn, Trump’s former national security advisor.

Well-known members of the Trump’s cabinet and the reasonable figures of the Republican Party are sitting on one side of the contest, and the circle of Trump’s advisors, who can be referred to as the members of his cabinet in “The Southern White House” are on the other side of the competition.

Flynn’s resignation as well as a number of other inconsistencies in the Trump administration have intensified speculations about the likeliness of Trump being forced to announce resignation in the near future.

According to a Farsi report by Khorasan newspaper, Trump is spending so much time at his posh Mar-a-Lago resort in Florida which he has started to call “The Southern White House”.

A Spanish phrase meaning ‘sea to lake’, Mar-a-Lago is a huge, old 126-bedroom mansion located in one of the most upscale neighbourhoods of the Palm Beach in Florida. Trump bought the manor in 1985 for $10 million and then turned it into a private club. Since coming into power as the new US president, Trump has spent all his weekends at Mar-a-Lago. However, the members of the club are pleased with being in contact with the US senior statesmen and having direct access to them. Mar-a-Lago or “The Southern White House” is home to part of Trump’s cabinet and a number of his advisors mostly comprising billionaires and his trusted army generals — those who are accused of being more concerned with their own interests than those of the US.

 

Flynn, First Victim of Clash between Washington Factions

Flynn was the first victim of the skirmish between the factions and centres of power in the Trump administration. Flynn resigned on February 13 over allegations that he had contacts with Russia.

Commenting on Flynn’s resignation, Jefferson Morley, the AlterNet‘s Washington correspondent, wrote in an opinion piece, “In the larger political context, what we are seeing is the clash of Washington factions. Trump is an incipient tyrant, as Yale historian Tim Snyder has pointed out. But Washington’s factions will not surrender their powers without a struggle. The factions are based in the Executive Branch agencies and are led by senior officials and the bureaucratic cadres that support them.”

“In the White House, a much smaller but still powerful faction around Steve Bannon is consolidating power and persisting with Trump’s campaign promises: Barring refugees from Muslim countries, stepping up deportations of undocumented residents and dismantling the NATO alliance.

“Bannonization of National Security Policy Continues”

“Flynn’s conversations with the Russian ambassador were perhaps defensible. Mike McFaul, Obama’s former ambassador to Moscow, said he had pre-inauguration contacts with Russian officials, adding that he didn’t make any deals…” But why Trump did not support Flynn and, instead, fired him.

Morley also wrote, “The winner, for now, is White House chief strategist Steve Bannon,” maintaining that, “Bannon’s next victim is likely to be White House chief-of-staff Reince Priebus.”

Nevertheless, it would not be plausible to think that the opposing side in the body of the Republican Party including figures such as Senator Lindsey Graham, Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee Senator John McCain and House Speaker Paul Ryan will sit idle waiting for the secret cabinet’s next move.

In another opinion piece titled “How Can We Get Rid of Trump?” — published by The New York Times on February 18 — Nicholas Kristof reviewed and discussed legal ways to remove Trump from office. Pointing to the Section 4 of the US Constitution’s 25th Amendment, he said there is a clean and quick way to remove Trump which has never been attempted: “It [Section 4 of the 25th Amendment] provides that the cabinet can, by a simple majority vote, strip the president of his powers and immediately hand power to the vice president [Mike Pence].”

The 25th Amendment of the US Constitution, proposed by Congress and ratified by the states in the aftermath of the assassination of the former US president, John F. Kennedy, provides the procedures for replacing the president or vice president in the event of death, removal, resignation, or incapacitation.

Kristof added, “Trump does have one weakness, and it’s parallel to Nixon’s. Republicans in Congress were willing to oust Nixon partly because they vastly preferred his vice president, Gerald Ford — just as congressional Republicans prefer Mike Pence today.”

In an opinion piece published by Newsweek on February 19, Ronald L. Feinman maintained that: “Pence faces now a situation that has some similarity to Gerald Ford under Richard Nixon during a time of trouble and controversy, and the possibility of future Congressional action against Donald Trump if his mental behaviour continues to disturb the top leadership of the Republican Party and the foreign policy establishment.”

   
   

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

two × 3 =

*